S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 members (2 invisible),
446
guests, and
5
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums10
Topics38,610
Posts546,962
Members14,427
|
Most Online1,344 Apr 29th, 2024
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 213
Sidelock
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 213 |
I have just acquired an old damascus barreled Baker serial number 3538 in 12 gauge. 26 inch barrels that must have opened at one time to cyl/cyl. The chambers have also been opened to 2.75 inches as I would think that these old circa 1890 or so guns would have been 2.5 inch chambered. The gun has a nice bird dog etched on each side of the action. The unusual part is that the old girl has an Infallible trigger that functions great. The gun is properly on face and is mechanically good but a bit rough costmetically. Any info/ideas on model, date of manufacture, etc. To date I have cleaned at least 50 years of grim from the gun and will have it restored after the season. Any info would be appreciated. Tom
Luck is the residue of good intention and hard work.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 5,539 Likes: 170
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 5,539 Likes: 170 |
Hammer gun or hammerless? Pictures would help Here is a picture the single trigger in my Baker Your dog look like this? or like this? Mike
Last edited by skeettx; 12/19/10 04:17 PM.
USAF RET 1971-95
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 213
Sidelock
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 213 |
Mike, The engraving on mine is not as extensive as the ones in your photos. The bird dogs on mine look much like yours in the first photo but are looking up at the same symbols seen on yours that I call flying turnips. Further, the switch for my barrel selector is on top of the tang near the safety. I have a second Baker with steel barrels with a serial number 6657 that is in excellent condition and has been restocked. It has the same bird dogs on the sides of the action. No grade is indicated anywhere on the gun. Tom
Luck is the residue of good intention and hard work.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 477
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 477 |
Tom:
Did you recently get this gun from Ed Lander? If not, he has/had one just like it. Might check with him.
p.s. With the engraving you describe - Damascus = A grade, Twist = B grade I'm no expert, if I'm wrong on this, I'm sure someone will correct me.
Last edited by Norm; 12/19/10 09:41 PM. Reason: ps
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 12,743
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 12,743 |
I would guess the Infallible trigger is an after market on your gun. I have a very late Lefever, probably assembled at Ithaca which has an Infallible trigger on it. This one may have been there when built or may not have. The trigger is selectable but does not reset upon opening the gun. Thus if one bbl only is fired & then gun opened & reloaded it will still fire the opposite bbl on next trigger pull unless manually reset. The selector slide on the tang moves to the other position with each trigger pull.
Miller/TN I Didn't Say Everything I Said, Yogi Berra
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,897 Likes: 110
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,897 Likes: 110 |
From your description it sounds like you have a Baker Grade "R". It was a later addition to the Baker line and was in production at the time, 1912 and later, when Lancaster Arms Co. was making the Infallible Single Trigger.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 213
Sidelock
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 213 |
Researcher Many thanks. Both of my Baker's steel SN: 6657 and damascus SN: 3538 show the identical bird dogs looking up at the flying turnip type swirl same as in the pictures provided above. No birds are on the sides. Do you have any info on dates of manufacture, etc. Both guns have 26 inch barrels and the 3538 gun has the original Baker buttplate with a LOP of only 13.5 perhaps due to the mounting of the single Infallible trigger. There is no evidence that this gun was ever a double trigger shotgun. Any additional info would be appreciated. Merry Christmas to you and to all the board members. Tom
Luck is the residue of good intention and hard work.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 6,280 Likes: 211
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 6,280 Likes: 211 |
Tom, both serial numbers of your gun are in the A and B serial no. range. I would guess your 3538 has engraved dogs, rather than etched. I think the Infallible trigger could have been an option supplied by the factory. It was a somewhat better trigger, design wise, than the Baker one. R grades were from a period when Baker marked the grade on watertable.
Last edited by Daryl Hallquist; 12/20/10 01:11 PM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 213
Sidelock
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 213 |
Daryl, Many thanks! I was hoping that you might see my entry. Question: Is there in print a book on Baker shotguns? I have noted a difference in the two guns I have. The damsacus gun with the 35XX SN. assembles with a stud on the fore-end iron pushing back s plunger that protrudes from receiver, somewhat like a Parker. The 66XX steel gun has a cocking arm that protrudes into the fore-end arm when assembled and must be carefully pushed back into the receiver when the gun is assembled. Comments on this please. Regards, Tom
Luck is the residue of good intention and hard work.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,897 Likes: 110
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,897 Likes: 110 |
We are still waiting for Daryl and Chris to write it!!
The Lancaster Arms Co., the maker of the Infallible single trigger, wasn't around until 1912, a few years after Baker had dropped the A and B grades. So, it has to be a retro-fit.
Last edited by Researcher; 12/20/10 02:42 PM.
|
|
|
|
|