Somewhat damped down in this discussion but flaring prominently in a previous go round is the admonition that DGJ welcomes submissions from non-professional writers. Aside from content dear to the heart and content not so dear, I spot an article every few issues which is devoid of much other than bragging rights on a singular (in the author's opinion) collector "find". Also, devotion to pompous and awkward sentence construction makes my teeth grate together. It's imperative that I ask myself if I could do better? Probably not. Easier to spectate than to put it on the line. I really enjoyed Mr Archer's SAC series.

jack