James M all that poll means is that 97% of those that both saw and responded to the poll think that there is a cover-up. It is not a valid poll.
But the FBI handed out immunity like Peanut M&Ms. One of the Fox talking heads said that all the administration figures refusing to answer a question by invoking their Fifth Amendment rights made it look like an investigation of a Cosa Nostra family.
The FBI Director has been acting as if he had no intention of really investigating Mrs Clinton. As has been mentioned the FBI handed out immunity from prosecution like candy to a roomful of kids. There never was any intent to indict anyone, the FBI gave everyone but Mrs Clinton immunity. No grand jury was ever empaneled. Director Comey has several times said that Mrs Clinton showed no "obvious intent" to violate the statute concerning lawful handling of classified material. "Obvious intent" or "intent" are not mentioned in the law, only the fact that classified material has been mishandled. Comey is making it up as goes along.
There are numerous press articles pointing out the entire process has been deliberately mishandled.
http://www.wsj.com/articles/james-comeys-clinton-immunity-1475017121http://observer.com/2016/09/the-fbi-investigation-of-emailgate-was-a-sham/http://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/20...urley/91092182/ This article by George Washington U Law Professor Jonathan Turley is very convincing. He is a very well known and widely respected liberal law professor.
The fix was in, all the way from the top IMHO.
Best!
