|
|
|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 members (SKB, Stanton Hillis, mark, 1 invisible),
496
guests, and
5
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Forums10
Topics38,579
Posts546,672
Members14,425
| |
Most Online1,344
Apr 29th, 2024
|
|
If a specific post was interesting or useful to you, we recommend that you Like that post. It tells the post author, and others, that you found the information valuable. Clicking Like is another way to let others know that you enjoy it without leaving a comment.
Log in to join the conversation and Like this content.
|
|
|
 Re: Surprising vitality of ancient ammunition
#646187
Apr 28th a 05:15 PM
|
| by Fudd |
| Fudd |
Hrm. I'm wondering if those embrittled split cases weren't caused by the mercuric priming compounds of the day. I mean, brass work-hardens, but brass sitting still isn't getting worked much. Are those cracked ones from the non-headstamped lot?
|
|
|
|
|
|