S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
Forums10
Topics38,547
Posts546,146
Members14,423
|
Most Online1,344 Apr 29th, 2024
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 7,438
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 7,438 |
Dave: These statistics wil be ignored by the majority of the so-called "mainstream news media". Their goal is the complete disarming of private citizens in this Country and anything posted contrary to this goal will either be ignored or dismissed as the statements of extrememists. You can't convert to socialism in this Country with an armed populace who can resist so disarmnament as a first step is the primary goal at this time. Jim
The 2nd Amendment IS an unalienable right.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,015
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,015 |
Dave: These statistics wil be ignored by the majority of the so-called "mainstream news media". Their goal is the complete disarming of private citizens in this Country and anything posted contrary to this goal will either be ignored or dismissed as the statements of extrememists. You can't convert to socialism in this Country with an armed populace who can resist so disarmnament as a first step is the primary goal at this time. Jim and ignored on here,"as long as its not "my" guns" back to the basement,sorry to intrude being part to the "evil" 10-who have taken over the board,maybe they will stop before the doubles get banned,no need to worry
Hillary For Prison 2018
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,435 Likes: 1
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,435 Likes: 1 |
Doubles WILL be banned, at least in CT, if the proposed ban on firearms capable of firing more than one round without reloading is passed. Some have thought for too long that it couldn't happen here or it wouldn't happen to their guns. Well...it's happening right now. We'd better get together with the black rifle boys or we're all going to hang together.....and soon!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 11,346 Likes: 391
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 11,346 Likes: 391 |
https://membership.nrahq.org/forms/signu...mp;hid=20731469NRA annual memberships are now being offered for $25.00 per year. That's $10.00 off. Membership will include a magazine subscription and $7500.00 Arms Insurance and more. It will also send a strong message to Politicians that America is not ready to give up the Second Amendment. If you've ever thought about joining or let an old membership lapse, there is no better time to join. If you never considered joining, this just might be a good time to give it a try... while you still can. Don't ever give up without a fight!
A true sign of mental illness is any gun owner who would vote for an Anti-Gunner like Joe Biden.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 7,438
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 7,438 |
Breaking News From Newsmax.com
Ed Meese: Obama Risks 'Impeachment' With Executive Order on Guns Former U.S. Attorney General Edwin Meese III declares in an exclusive Newsmax TV interview that President Barack Obama could easily be impeached if he bypassed Congress and enacted gun-control legislation by executive order — a step Obama said he was "confident" was "within his authority." But Meese, who served under President Reagan, says it would not be legal or constitutional: "If he tried to override the Second Amendment in any way, it would be an impeachable offense." Read the Full Story and See the Video — Go Here Now
The 2nd Amendment IS an unalienable right.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,373 Likes: 6
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,373 Likes: 6 |
Three good articles in the WSJ today: The first exposes the holes in the federal database used for background checks, due to many states failing to provide the necessary records. Background records lacking The second is an opinion piece by a former DC prosecutor (who claims to dislike guns) detailing how the DC ban was a total failure, even before it was overturned in Heller. DC Ban Failed to Curb Gun Violence Another op-ed piece looks at the mental health initiatives proposed in CO, which are being largely ignored by the press in their haste to focus on gun-control initiatives only. HIckenlooper's Gun Control
Such a long, long time to be gone, and a short time to be there.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,373 Likes: 6
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,373 Likes: 6 |
Here is an excerpt from a 1/13 Boston Globe editorial. Perhaps the stupidest proposal I have heard yet, and Exh. A for why people who don't use or own firearms should not be proposing ideas for gun control legislation: In Massachusetts, in addition to clearing a federal background check to buy a gun, owners also must have a license issued by local police. Those licenses should be public information, as a similar type of permit required for pistols in New York already is. In New York, that data allowed a newspaper in White Plains to publish its much-discussed map of local pistol-permit holders. Making the information public gives residents a clearer idea about the extent of gun ownership in their community, and alerts them to potential safety risks — for instance, if a gun permit were granted to someone with a history of domestic violence. In Massachusetts, because decisions about who receives a license are made on the local level, publicizing them would also serve as a check on favoritism or other improper actions by police. Gun advocates worry that opening the names of license-holders to scrutiny would provide thieves with a shopping list, or stigmatize gun owners, but those concerns need to take a back seat to public safety and accountability.
Such a long, long time to be gone, and a short time to be there.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,292
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,292 |
Those Libtards don't have the brains God gave a goose......!.....
Doug
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 7,438
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 7,438 |
I tend to view this in a different light. By publishing the address of those that own firearms aren't they also telling the criminal element which homes DON'T have firearms? It has been well substainted in past studies that criminals tend to avoid home with firearms because they don't want to be shot. But then,one would have to possess common sense,to recognize this fact. Jim
The 2nd Amendment IS an unalienable right.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 7,065
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 7,065 |
It has been well substainted in past studies that criminals tend to avoid home with firearms because they don't want to be shot. But then,one would have to possess common sense,to recognize this fact. Jim Jim could you give me a link to those studies or the authors' names. I was unable to Google them out. That information would be useful to me in discussions on other forums. Thanks, Mike
I am glad to be here.
|
|
|
|
|