|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forums10
Topics38,476
Posts545,192
Members14,410
|
Most Online1,335 Apr 27th, 2024
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,985 Likes: 299
Sidelock
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,985 Likes: 299 |
For those that have shot both,
Are there any discernible differences in handling between Miroku and Browning shotguns of similar class?
Out there doing it best I can.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 9,740 Likes: 97
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 9,740 Likes: 97 |
think of the miroku as a light, well balanced field gun...carried a lot...shot a little...if shot a lot, it will beat you up...
think of the browning as a heavy target gun...carried a little...shot a lot...if shot a lot, you will not be sore at the end of the day...
the browning is almost indestructible...the miroku, not so much...
Last edited by ed good; 01/24/18 07:24 PM.
keep it simple and keep it safe...
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 9,381 Likes: 1
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 9,381 Likes: 1 |
I had two 12ga BSS and nice Charles Daly 20ga O/U by B.C. Miroku. The Browning version of O/U with light receiver called I think Feather is a lot lighter than 20ga 3" Charles Daly. The Montgomery Ward extractor version of BSS had thinner barrels and did weigh a little less. Charles Daly B.C. Miroku O/Us were nicer guns. For example, they had Trap or Skeet version that had mechanism actuated by sliding button on side of receiver allowing inactivation of ejector system which Brownings never came equipped with.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 43
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 43 |
I have MK38 Miroku & used to have 425 Browning. Barrels would interchange. MK had no porting. MKS quite different from Dalys, which I have owned also. Also MK was fixed chokes.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 43
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 43 |
I have MK38 Miroku & used to have 425 Browning. Barrels would interchange. MK had no porting. MKS quite different from Dalys, which I have owned also
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,985 Likes: 299
Sidelock
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,985 Likes: 299 |
I am trying to discern handling differences between Browning Citori 30" 20 ga and Miroku MK60 20ga 30" Primary difference I think is fixed vs changeable chokes
I don't know if actions are lighter or barrels struck thinner, stocks slightly different etc.
I think their MOI should be similar.
Out there doing it best I can.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 43
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 43 |
I think that is exactly right. Barrels make the difference & MK60 has no porting!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,985 Likes: 299
Sidelock
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,985 Likes: 299 |
I am comparing them to the "Rizzini style" 30" 20ga O/U, trying to find a balanced, yet dynamic pair for driven red grouse and Sept partridges
I can't find Miroku Mk60 in US so am extrapolating from Citori.
Out there doing it best I can.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 1,415 Likes: 193
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 1,415 Likes: 193 |
Greg, Barrels chambered for 3" shells will be considerably heavier than those chambered for 2 3/4" ones. Karl
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,954 Likes: 12
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,954 Likes: 12 |
CZ, sorry to say I don't have any close enough comparables to help you. Frustrating when I have the tools, but lack the data. My data tells you exactly what you ask, but I just don't have the right guns.
DDA
|
|
|
|
|
|