|
|
|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forums10
Topics38,440
Posts544,755
Members14,404
| |
Most Online1,258
Mar 29th, 2024
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 101 Likes: 7
Sidelock
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 101 Likes: 7 |
Anyone recognize this barrel proof? 
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 10,770 Likes: 182
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 10,770 Likes: 182 |
Probably what is left of the 4000 Atm test(4000 Atmosphären-Pulver) stamp?
Cheers,
Raimey
rse
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 10,770 Likes: 182
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 10,770 Likes: 182 |
 Cheers, Raimey rse
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 101 Likes: 7
Sidelock
|
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 101 Likes: 7 |
Would that be appropriate for a like new Mauser 98 barrel chambered in 8x68s? That is the only proof on the barrels.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 10,770 Likes: 182
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 10,770 Likes: 182 |
Maybe? It should have looked like the below image.  Cheers, Raimey rse
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 5,530 Likes: 169
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 5,530 Likes: 169 |
Possible initial proof for a barrel never fitted to a rifle action. After fitting it would require final proof Look at item #7 http://www.shotguns.se/html/germany_1890-1945.html
Last edited by skeettx; 01/27/19 02:38 PM.
USAF RET 1971-95 ![[Linked Image from jpgbox.com]](http://www.jpgbox.com/jpg/57865_80x60.jpg)
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 10,770 Likes: 182
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 10,770 Likes: 182 |
I don't think it to be a proofmark but something akin to an arsenal mark or a Mauser Oberndorf mark or a Carl Gustaf type stamp, if such stamps did indeed exist.
Cheers,
Raimey
rse
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 4,458 Likes: 206
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 4,458 Likes: 206 |
I agree with skeetx that the barrel likely hasn't been installed, but disagree that the mark is a German proof mark. I agree with Raimey that it is likely an arsenal mark, maybe Swedish.
Mike
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 101 Likes: 7
Sidelock
|
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 101 Likes: 7 |
I think they might be NOS Swedish M39 (M98 Mauser) 8x63 barrels. Guess I’ll have to do a chamber cast to see if they really are 8x68.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 7,463 Likes: 212
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 7,463 Likes: 212 |
I wouldn't know for sure, but it looks like a Swedish mark. That may(?) be military contours, and if it's a M39 barrel, I don't think it will measure to fit a M98 type action. It might be a 6.5mm barrel, if it fits a M39 action.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 101 Likes: 7
Sidelock
|
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 101 Likes: 7 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 7,463 Likes: 212
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 7,463 Likes: 212 |
Thanks for clearing it up. I can see on that open book page that I was thinking about the M38 that uses the M96 type action. Thanks again.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 4,458 Likes: 206
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 4,458 Likes: 206 |
Notice the photo of the muzzle brake in the above link. It is stamped with the same mark.
Mike
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
