S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
Forums10
Topics38,543
Posts546,082
Members14,420
|
Most Online1,344 Apr 29th, 2024
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,579 Likes: 88
Sidelock
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,579 Likes: 88 |
I've just received a .458 high grade FN, made in Belgium, Browning rifle. Mauser action. It's almost new condition except for some gun safe marks. The person that I got it from bought it in 1975 and said he shot it exactly twice and said it kicked his butt. He put it away and never fired it again. SN# 2X143xx. Lots of engraving, floorplate and triggerguard has gold fill of an Ibex or maybe a sheep. Right side has the following: Browning Arms Company St Louis Mo & Montreal PQ. It has a silver shield with an initial on the bottom of the stock. Any help on the age, model and value would be appreciated. I can post photos if needed.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 101
Member
|
Member
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 101 |
Hi Mike, Sounds like a Medallion Grade to me. My dad had one way back in 1972, I think. It was almost new then, he got it on a trade. His was a 30-06, and had incredible wood as I remember. He always said that he regretted selling it. Hope that helps a little. Ron
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 3,205
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 3,205 |
A Medallion Grade would be in the $2000 to $3000 range.
Ole Cowboy
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,540 Likes: 3
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,540 Likes: 3 |
the "2" means it was made in 1962 (or at least the serial # was assigned to the receiver then). the "X" means it's a medallion grade. per eastman's book, 1962 was the first year the medallion and olympian grades were offered but he's at least partly wrong in that as i owned an olympian grade that was dated 1961. but i've also owned a couple of BAR's in higher grades that were also dated a year prior to when he claims they were available.
that gun will by default be a long extractor and not a chance of salt, i.e. one of the most desireable, particularly in a big magnum. the initial shield wouldn't be original to the gun unless someone ordered it that way. unlikely but no way to prove either way unless there were some authenticating paperwork with it.
roger
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,579 Likes: 88
Sidelock
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,579 Likes: 88 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 6,250
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 6,250 |
Nobody has a strong desire to pop-off a 458, oh sure, they'll go right thru a rotting stump in the meadow. ...but they just make a little bigger holes in paper than do the 22lr. Had a Colt-Sauer Grand African, that was traded-off for an Anschutz 1710 after a few rounds.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,185 Likes: 47
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,185 Likes: 47 |
I suggest you cook up some reduced loads for your 458 before you trun it loose. It's pretty simple to come up with equivalent 45-70 power loads. Cast bullets can be pretty entertaining also. I shoot reduced loads in my .460 Weatherby and .416 Dakota for grins. Of course I use full house loads when I go on an Okie Safari!!!!!!! The rogue armadillos are really a problem around here!!!!
Dodging lions and wasting time.....
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,540 Likes: 3
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,540 Likes: 3 |
in a proper rifle, 458's aren't that bad and are a lot of fun to shoot. the stock design on the browning safari's was the most comfortable stock shape ever put on a rifle for handling recoil. i never had a 458 but did have 375's and recoil even off the bench was of no consequence. the weight is a little surprising, being that light, but there was apparently quite a bit of variation in the wood browning used on their higher grades. i had a midas 12 3" mag once that only weighed 7.5# (supposed to be 8#+), same as a 26" bbld lightning i had at the time.
yeah, that rifle is a really good one - all early features including the rear sight (which is a really good sight design). the only thing anyone would find to complain about is it not beint mint and there's appropriate responses to that. i'd sure be proud to own it.
roger
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,935
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,935 |
My .02... I like the gun but I just can't take basketweave checkering.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,522
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,522 |
While the stock design is good for recoil, I still would like to see at least a couple more pounds on a .458. Agree the rifle is great and that the cartridge can be nicely tamed with some proper handloads making it tolerable for non dangerous game and the shooter.
|
|
|
|
|