No beef from you either, Keith. Not even one contrarian scientist who questions the lead ban? How come we have them on climate change, evolution, etc, but not on the lead ban? Sorry Keith, but you don't have the credentials to discredit anything. Throw a bunch of crap up against the wall . . . except none of it sticks. And even if it did, it wouldn't mean anything. Come back when you find SCIENTISTS discrediting the lead ban, just like we can find contrarian scientists challenging man-made climate change and evolution. The fact that you think it's easy to shoot holes in the decision to ban lead shot for waterfowl only proves that you're unqualified with the "gun" you're using. Surely, somewhere, the truth is out there . . . but you just keep blathering on and coming up empty.