When there is an objective discussion the subjective discussion has a foundation and is much more meaningful. Guns are solid objects that obey the laws of physics. The gun's part in handling is objectively defined by its weight, balance (teeter-totter), unmounted swing effort (MOI at balance), and mounted swing effort (MOI at butt). With that as a foundation (how the gun is) we can have a more meaningful discussion as to how we as individual shooters react to guns with various handling measurements.

Barrel length is very interesting, but must be studied in conjunction with barrel weight and weight distribution. Likewise, barrel characteristics must be related to the action and stock.

If anyone is interested we can go further.

DDA