|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
Forums10
Topics39,510
Posts562,207
Members14,588
|
Most Online9,918 Jul 28th, 2025
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 107
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 107 |
GrandView YOU STATED: Further perusal of O'Connor's Rifle & Hunting Rifle books will show pictures of the gun and it's many changes. Including multiple scopes and mounts, metal buttplate removed for recoil pad installation, new bolt and safety, and Lyman receiver sight removed and wood patch installed.
Please tell me where the pictures of this rifle [Minar] are in the Jack O'Connor "The Hunting Rifle" book. I have looked through my 1970 copy and can find no such photos...please enlighten me! Thanks Jerry
In the 1970 copy it's on the 10th page of photos. Right below a Winslow Mauser. That picture and location is the same in the 1970 and 1981 printings. The fact you didn't recognize it must mean you are unfamiliar with the rifle. No great sin.......but it does beg the question how you can be so critical of those who are familiar with it. 
Last edited by GrandView; 12/23/11 05:23 AM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 621
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 621 |
Thanks:I found that photo earlier...but where are all the ones you are so familiar with, you speak of [e.g.with and without different scope etc.] that show its' many different forms? A single picture without attribution [it doesn't identify it as a Minar]is not what I call "EYE OPENING". Just perhaps I can be pardoned for not being familiar with it as a Minar, given this is your sole identificaton method. Mea Culpa
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,341 Likes: 77
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,341 Likes: 77 |
Umm, I am kind of surprised that no one has done a buy-it-now on this 458 mag Merry Christmas
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 1,330 Likes: 109
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 1,330 Likes: 109 |
Not a bad looking rifle. Interesting detail on pic #4 at top of checkering basically below the rear sight. I have 2 thumper guns presently, how many does a person need? 
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 301
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 301 |
Umm, I am kind of surprised that no one has done a buy-it-now on this 458 mag Merry Christmas That rifle is...odd. There are lots of problems with it stylistically that would keep me from buying it. It shows the amateur metalsmithing of a professional stockmaker. Plus it's a .458, a caliber that does nothing to raise the price.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,153
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,153 |
Amateur period-styled bolt handle and military TG, 2 definitely clashing No-Nos IMO. Otherwise very nice, caliber notwithstanding. Regards, Joe
You can lead a man to logic but you can't make him think. NRA Life since 1976. God bless America!
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 1,330 Likes: 109
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 1,330 Likes: 109 |
The bolt handle (overall shape) is less then what we think of today as well as the trigger guard which could be replaced. Gun is the 60's / 70's or seems to be.
If I needed a big caliber gun it would be worthy of consideration as a purchase. I think there is a Cape Buff out there who may not be quite so concerned with the minor flaws if he was looking down the bore. LOL
Thanks Ryan for sharing.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 301
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 301 |
The bolt handle (overall shape) is less then what we think of today as well as the trigger guard which could be replaced. Gun is the 60's / 70's or seems to be.
If I needed a big caliber gun it would be worthy of consideration as a purchase. I think there is a Cape Buff out there who may not be quite so concerned with the minor flaws if he was looking down the bore. LOL
Thanks Ryan for sharing. Certainly. Not speaking to the rifle's fitness for purpose, only to what it will bring on the auction block.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 4
Boxlock
|
Boxlock
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 4 |
Very sorry to hear about Michael Petrov's passing. I am Jules La Batchni's step-son. Along with my mother, he raised my sister and me from 1960 to 1970 in Santa Monica, CA. While growing up I watched hour-upon-hour as he hand-crafted custom guns for sale as well as commissioned by many a Hollywood star. Jules taught me to shoot as well as how to play the saxophone. Jules did not work for Pachmayer during my time with him, but I did hear stories of him working there prior. I spoke several times with Michael Petrov providing him with intimate, first-hand accounts but we then lost touch. I hope that someone continues his research on Jules or that I might come to get copies. If anyone is sincerely interested in learning the truth about Jules La Batchni - first-hand accounts from someone who lived with him and worked in his shop for ten years...please feel free to reach out.
|
|
|
|
|
|