October
S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31
Who's Online Now
3 members (SKB, John E, 1 invisible), 783 guests, and 3 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums10
Topics39,514
Posts562,221
Members14,590
Most Online9,918
Jul 28th, 2025
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 3 of 5 1 2 3 4 5
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 270
Likes: 31
Sidelock
***
Offline
Sidelock
***

Joined: May 2003
Posts: 270
Likes: 31
To answer Rogers query on the 16ga popularity in Continental Europe I believe the answer lies in a Napoleonic Era edict which forbade the populace from owning firearms that were equal to military issue muskets. The Brown Bess, Brunswick and French Smooth bores were all .720-.730 caliber, thus sportsmen were confined to 16bore and smaller.


Hugh Lomas,
H.G.Lomas Gunmakers Inc.
920 876 3745
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 6,457
Likes: 336
Sidelock
***
Offline
Sidelock
***

Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 6,457
Likes: 336
Hugh, that's good info. I had always "guessed" that the 16s fit the commonly used drillings etc. better than the 12 did. Probably better ammo availability for the 16 , too.

Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 7,065
Likes: 1
Sidelock
***
Offline
Sidelock
***

Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 7,065
Likes: 1
Originally Posted By: Mike Bonner
Well, one can load any gauge on a MEC 600, short 28 ga, light 12 ga 2 1/4", not a big deal to those of us prepared to work at it.
Cheaper too. Just because it's not available from RST does not mean the gun is parked in the safe


My comment about the availability of 2-1/2 28 gauge compared to 2-1/2 16 gauge was in answer to this:

Originally Posted By: Mike Bonner
What about 28 ga British guns? These are a lot more desireable than a 16 with its marginal difference in weight to a 12 ga and mainly the availability of cheap and plentiful ammunition.

Last edited by AmarilloMike; 09/22/12 07:05 PM.


I am glad to be here.
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 32
Sidelock
Offline
Sidelock

Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 32
My godfather's father was an officer in the Naval Marines in the Golden Age of Shotgunning. He favored the 16 as it deterred the shell moochers on a busy drive.
Only works if they are shooting 12's.

Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 188
Sidelock
**
Offline
Sidelock
**

Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 188
Thanks Hugh, I was unaware of that historic piece of information. It makes lots of sense. I had been thinking along the lines of Daryl's comment because the few 12 gauge drillings I've encountered seemed awfully bulky.

Thanks,
Roger


C. Roger Bleile
Author of American Engravers-The 21st Century
FEGA Historian
www.engravingglossary.com
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,468
Sidelock
**
Offline
Sidelock
**

Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,468
I feel the % increase in British guns is less because Brit guns were usually upland guns and lighter than their American cousins. In our country, 12's (and 10's) were all around guns for deer and waterfowl while sub-gauges were for upland game. In Britain, 12's were mainly upland guns and 6 pounders were not uncommon. A 20 in a classic American shotgun is both rare and neatly balanced and light. They are worth more and sell quickly.

Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 12,743
Sidelock
***
Offline
Sidelock
***

Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 12,743
As I recall the Brown Bess shot a ball of about .720" dia while the french musket shot one of .69". Both had a good deal of "Windage" in the bore for easy loading so the Brown Bess went to about .750 as I recall with the Frwnch going about .720". A lot of the French muskets were used in our American Revolution & it became the basis for muskets of this period built here in America as the Commitie of Safety muskets. Some versins of the smoothbore .69 cal muskets were in use as late as the "War Between the States". There have been other instances in history where guns of "Government Caliber" have been declared illegal. This is in fact as I understand it what brought on the development of several non-.45 caliber Nitro Express rounds for use in Africa such as the .465s .470 etc all with similar balistics to the .45s they were replacing.


Miller/TN
I Didn't Say Everything I Said, Yogi Berra
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 11,573
Likes: 165
Sidelock
**
Offline
Sidelock
**

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 11,573
Likes: 165
Originally Posted By: Pete
I feel the % increase in British guns is less because Brit guns were usually upland guns and lighter than their American cousins. In our country, 12's (and 10's) were all around guns for deer and waterfowl while sub-gauges were for upland game. In Britain, 12's were mainly upland guns and 6 pounders were not uncommon. A 20 in a classic American shotgun is both rare and neatly balanced and light. They are worth more and sell quickly.


The Brits were much more into "purpose built" guns, while American gunmakers turned out far more "all around" guns. There's no shortage of vintage British fowlers and pigeon guns. We certainly had trap guns and waterfowl guns, but a lot of Americans used their Sterlingworth 12's for everything. I look at most American 12's in the same way I view a pair of the old LL Bean boots: not perfect for any specific purpose, but functional for just about everything. And while there are plenty of 12ga Brit game guns in the 6 1/4-6 3/4# range, finding one much lighter than that takes a fair amount of looking. But it takes a whole lot more looking to find an American 12 that goes mid-6#--which is why the 16 found (and still finds) favor with those who are looking for a gun for upland game.

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,393
Sidelock
***
Offline
Sidelock
***

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,393
Well, that was interesting, Joe I asssume that in the UK the 2 1/2" 28 ga shells are available?
I'd love to have a Webley 728. I would pay more for that that a 12 ga 700
I would not want a 16 ga though.

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 11,573
Likes: 165
Sidelock
**
Offline
Sidelock
**

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 11,573
Likes: 165
Mike, you would not need to worry about 2 1/2" shells for a Webley 728. They're new enough to be 2 3/4". I never owned one of those, but I did own a 720 (which was made during the same time period, dating from around 1970), and it had factory 3" chambers. It also weighed in the 5 3/4# range, and I figured anyone who shot a 3" shell in that gun had me in the bravery department. Or perhaps the foolish department.

Page 3 of 5 1 2 3 4 5

Link Copied to Clipboard

doublegunshop.com home | Welcome | Sponsors & Advertisers | DoubleGun Rack | Doublegun Book Rack

Order or request info | Other Useful Information

Updated every minute of everyday!


Copyright (c) 1993 - 2024 doublegunshop.com. All rights reserved. doublegunshop.com - Bloomfield, NY 14469. USA These materials are provided by doublegunshop.com as a service to its customers and may be used for informational purposes only. doublegunshop.com assumes no responsibility for errors or omissions in these materials. THESE MATERIALS ARE PROVIDED "AS IS" WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EITHER EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANT-ABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, OR NON-INFRINGEMENT. doublegunshop.com further does not warrant the accuracy or completeness of the information, text, graphics, links or other items contained within these materials. doublegunshop.com shall not be liable for any special, indirect, incidental, or consequential damages, including without limitation, lost revenues or lost profits, which may result from the use of these materials. doublegunshop.com may make changes to these materials, or to the products described therein, at any time without notice. doublegunshop.com makes no commitment to update the information contained herein. This is a public un-moderated forum participate at your own risk.

Note: The posting of Copyrighted material on this forum is prohibited without prior written consent of the Copyright holder. For specifics on Copyright Law and restrictions refer to: http://www.copyright.gov/laws/ - doublegunshop.com will not monitor nor will they be held liable for copyright violations presented on the BBS which is an open and un-moderated public forum.

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.0.33-0+deb9u11+hw1 Page Time: 0.225s Queries: 35 (0.195s) Memory: 0.8533 MB (Peak: 1.9016 MB) Data Comp: Off Server Time: 2025-10-14 19:12:03 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS