S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 members (Ted Schefelbein),
418
guests, and
4
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums10
Topics38,934
Posts550,858
Members14,460
|
Most Online1,344 Apr 29th, 2024
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,373 Likes: 6
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,373 Likes: 6 |
FAMARS went bankrupt on October 2012, what a pity. Interesting - it seemed like it was last year that they went on a big branding push with clothing and accessories. I wonder if the investment that required contributed to their financial problems. This is too cynical a thought to have at this hour of the morning, but FAMAR's fate hardly seems unusual when compared to most of the other high-end makers. Going back 120 years, which one hasn't experienced financial hardship or worse? Bosis Piotti FAMARS Perazzi Beretta SOs F'lli Rizzini Fabbri That seems like a lot of makers (just in Italy) looking to sell $30k+ OUs - how deep is that market, really?
Such a long, long time to be gone, and a short time to be there.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 6,513 Likes: 408
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 6,513 Likes: 408 |
FAMARS went bankrupt on October 2012, what a pity. Interesting - it seemed like it was last year that they went on a big branding push with clothing and accessories. I wonder if the investment that required contributed to their financial problems. I have worked with and extended credit to retailers for over 30 years. Small independents to large national chains. The times I am most worried about credit is when some retailer is showing me their grand plans for expansion.
The world cries out for such: he is needed & needed badly- the man who can carry a message to Garcia
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,008
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,008 |
Yep, and Holland & Holland are owned by the Chanel group.
That, of course, explains their short-lived line of clothing that was introduced some years ago to much snickering. Their new line of clothing is rather nice.
The market for discretionary toys in this price range is deeper than one might think, but the competition is fierce.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 5,021
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 5,021 |
I agree Gnomon and to deal in the affluent market name recognition is in my opinion paramount. But a name earned is a lot more expensive then a name given or assigned by that affluent society. Perazzi is earning their name, the English makers have already earned their names, did FAMARS?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,544
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,544 |
I saw the writing on the wall several months ago.
It is a shame. I very much enjoyed meeting Christina a few years ago and getting a tour of the factory while I was in Gardonne.
I can't say I'm surprised, though pretty, their guns had a tendency to be unreliable and their quality control was erratic. After-sales service was very poor too often. Finally it has all imploded. Very sad but these are tough times and all but the best run businesses run the risk of failing.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 74
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 74 |
Yep, and Holland & Holland are owned by the Chanel group. Not to nitpick but Holland & Holland is owned by the family that owns Chanel... They are not owned by the Chanel Group. It may be a small distinction but it is a very important distinction when it comes to the decision making process of the company.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,189 Likes: 18
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,189 Likes: 18 |
Since we already have a bit of thread drift present, I'd posit that Tony G. & CSM has perhaps one of the the better business plans for a small shop today. They do some spectacular high end work as well when desired and charge accordingly, plus they back all of their work up to the hilt. For those with a 'buy American' bent, we should be very proud that it is working well for them. I am.
Kolar is another small shop player that has become a presense in the American target gun market, though mostly skeet from my perspective. There is at least one flyer shooter of note using one.
Back to the Italian gun scene, Caesar Guerini is making a good name for themselves on many fronts here w/serviceable & reliable target guns. I personally do not think of them as high end, but I know several people who are doing their best to wear some of them out & they continue to perform and they have a 'balance' in some models that makes them lively for the intended use. Guerini are also spending 'tons' on advertising & doing the usual things to get some 'name' folks to shoot them. Time will tell if they become lasting players in the target gun market.
I find Dig's remarks on A&S both polite & spot on. It is a shame, quite. In the same breath, A&S made 'exquisite' for an ill definded carriage trade and the few top end guns I know of that got heavy use were not up to it.
On the P-guns, Chuck said it. Short & sweet.
P&V, OTOH, do near zero advertisment, but the discerning know what they are capable of and go to them willingly. Small shop, good guys, funny and fair. No pretense. They have a dif bidness model & they are proud. I think they will continue to be around. Wot's not to like about that?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 78 Likes: 4
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 78 Likes: 4 |
They did not go out of business because of any of the above mentioned causes. The reason is more profound than that.
They made exquisite guns and could do some things no other gun maker could or would do, such as a full sidelock gun where the entire trigger group and locks fell out with a simple backward push of the safety. They will be missed.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 6,304 Likes: 222
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 6,304 Likes: 222 |
Halifax, why did they go out of business ?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,278 Likes: 11
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,278 Likes: 11 |
Yeah, I've owned a Perazzi, liked it, but why would you want them to wipe out the competition? Maybe because they make top shelf competition shotguns? Just a SWAG here, but Perazzi, Piotti, Purdey-- Hallmarks as well known as: Rolex, Steinway, Ferrari-etc.. The very word competition means, as old Billy S. once so wisely wrote-- "Now cry havoc, and let slip the dogs of war"- You compete to win and to bury the opponents so far into the dust they can't rise up for the next event, right?? To crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and to hear the lamentation of their women. It's just business. Perazzi is dominant in several target markets because they build the best tool. They will also build what amount to bespoke guns but they don't have to since their market is a sort of tailored but not one off kinda gun. Krieghoff bought the skeet gun market. Beretta is making a run on the trap stuff by buying some top shooters. Churchill pointed out that all of his competition were fools for building those stupid long barrels. It's only business. You either meet/exploit the target segment's market demands, make their demands match your product, or fail. No mysteries there. have a day Dr.WtS
Last edited by Wonko the Sane; 12/29/13 02:32 PM.
Dr.WtS Mysteries of the Cosmos Unlocked available by subscription
|
|
|
|
|