| 
S | 
M | 
T | 
W | 
T | 
F | 
S | 
 
| 
 | 
 | 
 | 
 | 
 | 
 | 
		1
	 | 
 
| 
		2
	 | 
		3
	 | 
		4
	 | 
		5
	 | 
		6
	 | 
		7
	 | 
		8
	 | 
 
| 
		9
	 | 
		10
	 | 
		11
	 | 
		12
	 | 
		13
	 | 
		14
	 | 
		15
	 | 
 
| 
		16
	 | 
		17
	 | 
		18
	 | 
		19
	 | 
		20
	 | 
		21
	 | 
		22
	 | 
 
| 
		23
	 | 
		24
	 | 
		25
	 | 
		26
	 | 
		27
	 | 
		28
	 | 
		29
	 | 
 
| 
		30
	 | 
 | 
 | 
 | 
 | 
 | 
 | 
 
 
 | 
 
 
 
	
 
| 
7 members (SKB, LibertyForge_USA, 4 invisible),
511
guests, and 
6
robots. | 
 
| 
 
	Key:
	Admin,
	Global Mod,
	Mod
 
 | 
 
 
 | 
 
 
 
| 
 Forums10 
Topics39,560 
Posts562,786 
Members14,597 
 |  | 
 Most Online9,918 Jul 28th, 2025 
 | 
 
 
 | 
 
 
 
| 
 | 
 
Joined:  Dec 2001 
Posts: 12,743  
Sidelock 
 | 
 
 
Sidelock 
 
Joined:  Dec 2001 
Posts: 12,743  | 
In the 1908 Sear's catalog, quite possibly other years as well, they listed a "Little Ladies" single shot shotgun. This was available chambered for either the .44XL or for a .40-85 Win case. This case was in all likelihood the same as the .40-85 Ballard.  This was, of course, a rimmed case having a head diameter of 0.480" & a length of about 2 15/16". (Almost a 3" .410)  Sears only supplied these as primed empties & had to be loaded. A load was given which consisted of an appropriate charge of black powder with  oz of shot. 
 
  
Miller/TN I Didn't Say Everything I Said,  Yogi Berra
 |  
 
 | 
 
 
 | 
 
 
| 
 | 
 
Joined:  Feb 2002 
Posts: 2,859  
Sidelock 
 | 
 
 
Sidelock 
 
Joined:  Feb 2002 
Posts: 2,859  | 
I had an old British SXS hammer gun that I believe was originally proofed as a .44, it also had 2-3/4 chambers. I shot .410's through it and it worked just fine. The only thing was the .410 casings would swell slightly and wouldnt fit in a .410 Nitro Special after theyd been fired in the old hammer gun. Steve 
 
  
Approach life like you do a yellow light - RUN IT! (Gail T.)  
 |  
 
 | 
 
 
 | 
 
 
| 
 | 
 
Joined:  Jan 2006 
Posts: 9,775 Likes: 467  
Sidelock 
 | 
 
 
Sidelock 
 
Joined:  Jan 2006 
Posts: 9,775 Likes: 467  | 
Researcher had an excellent thread on Shotgunworld about the evolution of 44XL, .44-40, and .410 shotshells, but the images were lost in the Photobucket fiasco The 44XL and 28g "Small Double" were first listed in the 1910 H. & D. Folsom catalog. Catalog No. 13 1916 listed the gun in .410.  To be clear, 44XL shotshells could be used in the (new) .410/12mm chambered guns, but  not v.v.Folsom catalog No. 18 c. 1921 listed the "Midget Field Model" for 44 XL or .410 - "The one gun takes both sizes."  Here's a thread about using resized .44-40 brass http://jefenry.com/main/The44-Shot.php  
 
 |  
 
 | 
 
 
 | 
 
 
| 
 | 
 
Joined:  Dec 2001 
Posts: 12,743  
Sidelock 
 | 
 
 
Sidelock 
 
Joined:  Dec 2001 
Posts: 12,743  | 
I have one of those 28 gauge American Gun Company hammer doubles, but the stock is broken. I have wanted to see if I could repair it or else make a new one, but haven't done it yet. I weighed all the parts of this one & it went to right at 5  lbs. That's what a 28 gauge should weigh if it's going to weigh 6 lbs or + it would be better as a 20. 
 
  
Miller/TN I Didn't Say Everything I Said,  Yogi Berra
 |  
 
 | 
 
 
 | 
 
 
| 
 | 
 
Joined:  Jan 2002 
Posts: 10,756 Likes: 1381  
Sidelock 
 | 
 
 
Sidelock 
 
Joined:  Jan 2002 
Posts: 10,756 Likes: 1381  | 
Shooting a 5 lb gun isnt tough. Shooting a 5 lb gun exceptionally well, is tough.
  Best, Ted 
 
 |  
 
 | 
 
 
 | 
 
 
| 
 | 
 
Joined:  Dec 2001 
Posts: 12,743  
Sidelock 
 | 
 
 
Sidelock 
 
Joined:  Dec 2001 
Posts: 12,743  | 
Ted; There are of course a lot of different ways of looking at this. I have done a good bit of "Good" shooting with guns weighing from around 6 lb up through 7 lbs. They were all however in 20, 16 & 12 gauges. My personal preference is "IF" I  cannot shoot well with a gun lighter than 6 lbs I have no use for anything smaller than a 20. To me personally, the "ONLY" advantage of a smaller gauge is lightweight. Why would I want to pay a premium for the gun & then $12.00-$15.00 a box for shells, not quite the equal of what I can buy for around $5.50  a box, With all the advantages favoring the larger gauge? 
 
  
Miller/TN I Didn't Say Everything I Said,  Yogi Berra
 |  
 
 | 
 
 
 | 
 
 
| 
 | 
 
Joined:  Jan 2002 
Posts: 10,756 Likes: 1381  
Sidelock 
 | 
 
 
Sidelock 
 
Joined:  Jan 2002 
Posts: 10,756 Likes: 1381  | 
Miller,  Im cut from the same cloth. It is hard for me to pick up a box of either 28 or .410 ammunition, and reach for my wallet, when there is 12 and 20 gauge ammunition right next to it, for less money. I own a .410, and a 28. Shoot either, very little. But, that 12 gauge single shot Companion 12 gauge, at about 5 lbs and small change, is a demanding little minx as well.
  Best, Ted 
 
 |  
 
 | 
 
 
 | 
 
 
| 
 | 
 
Joined:  Feb 2008 
Posts: 11,805 Likes: 678  
Sidelock 
 | 
 
 
Sidelock 
 
Joined:  Feb 2008 
Posts: 11,805 Likes: 678  | 
 Why would I want to pay a premium for the gun & then $12.00-$15.00 a box for shells, not quite the equal of what I can buy for around $5.50  a box, With all the advantages favoring the larger gauge?   
 I've asked myself that question for years. The only answers that make any sense to me are  1) Challenging myself by using a gun that will make taking game or targets tougher. Or 2) Owning and using a gun that is more likely to appreciate in value over time.  Of course, If I put enough shells through it that cost nearly 3 times as much as the next larger gauge, I will quickly eat up any appreciation in value. I don't know if components to load for 28 gauge are much more expensive, but if I ever find the right gun at the right price, I have a Bair reloading press set up for 28 gauge, and a 28 gauge die set for a Mec. I don't know if jOe's new/old .44 shot gun has any real collector value, but I think it would be interesting and fun to load and shoot.   
 
  
Voting for anti-gun Democrats is dumber than giving treats to a dog that shits on a Persian Rug 
  
 |  
 
 | 
 
 
 | 
 
 
| 
 | 
 
Joined:  Mar 2011 
Posts: 4,206 Likes: 648  
Sidelock 
 | 
 
 
Sidelock 
 
Joined:  Mar 2011 
Posts: 4,206 Likes: 648  | 
It makes economic sense to reload .410, 28 and 16, especially if one shoots a lot or makes specialty loads and is into loading for the long haul.  For 12 and 20 unless one is making a specialty load such as low pressure or lighter payloads, it's not. Gil 
 
 |  
 
 | 
 
 
 | 
 
 
| 
 | 
 
Joined:  Jan 2002 
Posts: 14,033 Likes: 1832  
Sidelock 
 | 
 
 
Sidelock 
 
Joined:  Jan 2002 
Posts: 14,033 Likes: 1832  | 
Fact: All 5 lb. guns, or even sub 5 lb. guns, do not handle the same. I have a 4lb. 14 oz. 28" barreled S X S that Rocketman spun for me on his MOI turntable. As he did so I commented that it surprised me that I shot it well, since I'm used to shooting much heavier guns. He commented that it was because it had almost the same numbers as a 12 ga. English game gun. It's where the weight is located on the gun that matters to handling, much more so than just the total weight.
  Fact: Anyone who pays $12 a $15 a box for .410" shells is just lazy. I never pay over $8 for good 1/2 oz. factory loads, by the flat. They pattern great out of my guns. Beyond that, you can reload .410s so cheaply it is ridiculous. I do pay more for premium 3/4 oz. loads, while I am working up a good reload. But soon I will be loading .410 hunting loads, with nickel plated shot, for less than you can buy a cheap box of chilled shot 12s.
  Fact: If your life is ruled by practicality you will probably never enjoy a .410. You should probably stick with $289 12 ga. pump guns. But, if you like a challenge, if you like making it a little tougher on yourself to take a limit, or run a straight at skeet, you just might find the little guns grow on you.
  Fact: You don't have to pay a premium for a good .410 or 28 doublegun. I never have, and I've got 6 of them right now.
  Different strokes for different folks.
  SRH 
 
  
May God bless America and those who defend her.
 |  
 
 | 
 
 
 | 
 
 
 
   |  
 
 |