|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
Forums10
Topics39,768
Posts565,421
Members14,618
| |
Most Online9,918 Jul 28th, 2025
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,233 Likes: 62
Sidelock
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,233 Likes: 62 |
I don't think I've ever encountered proofs marked this way. And the chambers are marked 2-5/8". What time period would they have been applied? Photos: https://imgur.com/gallery/C6xSCOi
|
|
1 member likes this:
Parabola |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 9,831 Likes: 494
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 9,831 Likes: 494 |
Unfortunately low resolution & small image IF that is 1 1/8 to the R of the NITRO PROOF the marks would 1925-1954 with the (odd) chamber length Probably just the terrible image but could there be sleeve lines at the arrows? It looks suspiciously like the flats were polished and old proof marks removed? ![[Linked Image from photos.smugmug.com]](https://photos.smugmug.com/Proof-Marks/i-QNH4MsS/0/d05a2a2e/M/sGrb4U5-M.jpg) Another WR from 1928 also with Westley Richards Special Steel (but a different mark) also with the proof marks on the barrels. Reproof marks are on the flats as expected ![[Linked Image from photos.smugmug.com]](https://photos.smugmug.com/Proof-Marks/i-KCCnCw5/0/b0f7d086/S/1928%20WR-S.jpg) Maybe just a WR thing?
|
|
1 member likes this:
Parabola |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2020
Posts: 1,289 Likes: 625
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Dec 2020
Posts: 1,289 Likes: 625 |
Assuming it is a Westley Richards (I see the Triangle Trade Mark) T8974 dates from 1925/6.
Can you re-photograph the marks closer to the rib to get a better contrast please?
Last edited by Parabola; 12/24/23 06:07 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 1,546 Likes: 107
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 1,546 Likes: 107 |
For some reason Westley's unlike other Birmingham Makers got the proof house to stamp on the barrel tubes , A hang over to earlier times . Never knew why . As for sleeving 99.9% sure its all original as - 1 its not marked sleeved . 2 sleeving was under 1954 rules of proof as it was not common practice until the early 60's 3 it would not have been marked up this way with all the trade marks
|
|
4 members like this:
graybeardtmm3, Parabola, Ted Schefelbein, Drew Hause |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2023
Posts: 91 Likes: 19
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Nov 2023
Posts: 91 Likes: 19 |
None of my 3 westley richards have markings like that. One of them is sleeved, and is marked so on the barrel flats.
NRA life member
Retired investor, living on a pension.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 9,831 Likes: 494
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 9,831 Likes: 494 |
1933 2" WR with proof marks on the barrels ![[Linked Image from photos.smugmug.com]](https://photos.smugmug.com/Proof-Marks/i-r2SsNzF/0/b3f8eff6/M/2%20inch%20Westley%20Richards%201933-M.png) 1935 2" WR with marks on the flats ![[Linked Image from photos.smugmug.com]](https://photos.smugmug.com/Proof-Marks/i-X9f76wd/0/d3e7b0bc/M/WR%202%20inch%201935-M.jpg)
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 367 Likes: 25
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 367 Likes: 25 |
I have a heavy proof (1 1/4 oz.) 12 bore Westley Richards deluxe droplock s/n T6569, mfg. in 1916, that has barrel proofs and none on the flats, also, just like Drew's picture, and it is all original. The T prefix guns were export models; possibly that has some bearing on the markings. Sandlapper
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 7,657 Likes: 672
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 7,657 Likes: 672 |
1933 2" WR with proof marks on the barrels ![[Linked Image from photos.smugmug.com]](https://photos.smugmug.com/Proof-Marks/i-r2SsNzF/0/b3f8eff6/M/2%20inch%20Westley%20Richards%201933-M.png) Drew, is this one marked "FOR 2" CASE ONLY" on the top of the right barrel or the rib? I'm don't think it is a Skimin and Wood 2" but perhaps I'm mistaken. I think Wesley and Richards made 2" guns later than some of the other makers and probably with their own actions? I recall seeing one or two for sale somewhere that were definitely not S&W actions.
_________ BrentD, (Professor - just for Stan) =>/
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 637 Likes: 80
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 637 Likes: 80 |
I have a best grade 1928 drop lock with Birmingham proof marks on the barrels. The serial number is standard (no prefix). It is not uncommon for WR guns to have the proof marks on the barrels.
Ken
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 637 Likes: 80
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 637 Likes: 80 |
1933 2" WR with proof marks on the barrels ![[Linked Image from photos.smugmug.com]](https://photos.smugmug.com/Proof-Marks/i-r2SsNzF/0/b3f8eff6/M/2%20inch%20Westley%20Richards%201933-M.png) Drew, is this one marked "FOR 2" CASE ONLY" on the top of the right barrel or the rib? I'm don't think it is a Skimin and Wood 2" but perhaps I'm mistaken. I think Wesley and Richards made 2" guns later than some of the other makers and probably with their own actions? I recall seeing one or two for sale somewhere that were definitely not S&W actions. BrentD, This my gun and is a best WR boxlock not a Skimin and Wood. It was made for the Maharaja of Alwar. Ken
|
|
1 member likes this:
BrentD, Prof |
|
|
|
|