|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
Forums10
Topics39,517
Posts562,278
Members14,590
|
Most Online9,918 Jul 28th, 2025
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2021
Posts: 203 Likes: 78
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Apr 2021
Posts: 203 Likes: 78 |
Beautiful rifle! I love the express sight rail and the forend tip. Thanks for sharing pictures of it.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 604 Likes: 29
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 604 Likes: 29 |
Did we get the wrong picture? I see a really cool old G&H 03 Springfield? G&H number 665 would probably have been built before the model 70 was introduced. Regardless, I like it, thanks for sharing.
John
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 824 Likes: 32
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 824 Likes: 32 |
Yep a nice 1903 Springfield with a very cool model 70 style 3 position safety. Great find!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 242 Likes: 13
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 242 Likes: 13 |
Winchester style safety likely fitted when they changed over to 1in rings to use the newer weaver scope.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 125 Likes: 76
Sidelock
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 125 Likes: 76 |
Did we get the wrong picture? I see a really cool old G&H 03 Springfield? G&H number 665 would probably have been built before the model 70 was introduced. Regardless, I like it, thanks for sharing.
John You are correct... long day at the show and I wasn't paying close attention. The Lyman 48 is on the wrong side to be a Winchester... I'm still very happy with my new G&H... waiting to hear back from G&H regarding getting a build letter....
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 824 Likes: 32
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 824 Likes: 32 |
The early records burned up. I don’t remember the cutoff but I have #950 and there were no records for it.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 125 Likes: 76
Sidelock
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 125 Likes: 76 |
I heard back this week from G&H... their records only show the serial numbered rifle w/ qtr. rib was made in 1927. No "noted" customer. He said that they no longer offer "letters of authenticity". It will join my G&H .220 Swift, Sedgley .22 Hornet, Sedgley 30-06, Jaeger 30-06... got a half dozen 1903's still in original military configuration. Looking back, I wish I had been able to connect with Michael Petrov before he passed. I have both his books and reference them often. Side note: I sent a message & called the G&H engraver to investigate the cost to engrave the bold knob of my .220 Swift with a 4 petal panel and also put scrolling on both sides of the bolt housing. I ran into a young man at the Colorado Collector's show a few years back that said he was related to Michael... the firearms addiction has genetic implications...
Last edited by OSS; 02/01/25 10:17 PM.
|
1 member likes this:
earlyriser |
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2021
Posts: 203 Likes: 78
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Apr 2021
Posts: 203 Likes: 78 |
I would be interested to know what they estimate for the cost of engraving the bolt knob. I’m also considering some engraving in the future.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 824 Likes: 32
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 824 Likes: 32 |
So G&H was able to find an entry in their ledgers for No 665? This is great news!
They must have found a new stash of records. I remember talking to Bob Beach on the phone regarding my G&H #950 and he told me the records didn’t exist for the early rifles. I don’t remember what he told me the earliest serial numbers were they had records for at that time. Seems like 1200-1300 is where they began.
|
|
|
|
|
|