|
|
|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
|
Forums10
Topics39,493
Posts562,053
Members14,585
| |
Most Online9,918
Jul 28th, 2025
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,338 Likes: 76
Sidelock
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,338 Likes: 76 |
I saw this on gunbroker the other week and wondered if it was an early Paul Jaeger rifle. I am sure that there are others more knowledgeable and hope they will comment. early Jaeger??
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 311 Likes: 12
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 311 Likes: 12 |
The stock sure looks Sedgley like, which the early Jaegers did since Jaeger had originally worked for Sedgley.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 1,329 Likes: 109
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 1,329 Likes: 109 |
I don't think it has any significant heritage. It is most likely a gunsmith built rifle. The smith had some skills and did a reasonable job on wood. Metalwork is lacking in most ways.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 4,939 Likes: 342
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 4,939 Likes: 342 |
I can't prove a negative, but I don't see any thing that makes me believe this rifle is Paul Jaegers's work. Granted, it has a Paul Jaeger scope mount, but they were a pretty popular mount retailed separately by Paul Jaeger for Installation by others. Plus, the installation of the mount doesn't Show the workmanship expected and I never had the opinion that Pauel Jaeger was bashful about distinctly marking their work.
Mike
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,338 Likes: 76
Sidelock
|
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,338 Likes: 76 |
In pulling out my Jaeger 1903, i see a very similar front sight, barrel band, stock and buttplate, the barrel channel has the last three digits of the serial number given by Jaeger which is marked on the
barrel and receiver. What intrigued me about the Mauser on gunbroker, was the circle J proof mark on the bottom of the barrel. Sedgley used a circle S. I looked and my Jaeger does not have a proof mark.
So I wonder if there are examples of Jaeger's work with that circle J proof mark.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,912 Likes: 215
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,912 Likes: 215 |
Here's a discussion about and some pics of a Jaeger custom that does have the J in a circle mark on the bottom of the bbl. This rifle is Jaeger marked on the top of the bbl. It has some of the traits of the rifle orig posted (other than being built on an 03 of course). https://www.doublegunshop.com/forums/ubbthreads.php?ubb=showflat&Number=519286
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,338 Likes: 76
Sidelock
|
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,338 Likes: 76 |
Wow, you have a sharp eye and great memory.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 311 Likes: 12
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 311 Likes: 12 |
I have what I consider an early Jaeger sporter that has just Jaeger marked on the top of the barrel and it has the J in a circle on the bottom rear of the barrel. Of course, mine is an '03 Springfield and I believe the simple Jaeger marking is before he added the Jenkintown mark and maybe before he moved there. I had posted this to the wrong thread.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
