|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 members (dirty harry, 1 invisible),
589
guests, and
6
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Forums10
Topics40,058
Posts570,072
Members14,661
| |
Most Online19,682 Mar 28th, 2026
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 705 Likes: 159
Sidelock
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 705 Likes: 159 |
thanks Stephen, if you made it to the Southern, sorry we didn't connect.
This ain't a dress rehearsal , Don't Let the Old Man IN
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 14,424 Likes: 2199
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 14,424 Likes: 2199 |
I've disassembled and cleaned mine numerous times, I have seven of them. I've never had the need to repair anything in a Fox action, with the exception of a silver soldering job to repair a broken guide pin on an ejector, which I did myself some 10-12 years ago. I've never had, nor heard of, anyone who had a Fox hammer/striker to break, and I've never seen a Fox action with "mushroomed out" firing pin holes from dry firing, though I have seen that on many other makes of doubles. I've asked old doublegunsmiths what make of vintage double has come into your shop for repairs the least in your career. "Fox" is the common reply, not because there weren't many made, Fox sold multiple times more Sterlingworths than Parker did Trojans. Part of the reason is so few moving parts in a Fox lock . . . . four, as compared to a Parker with sixteen per lock. You may not care for Fox's design in peening the threaded end of the yoke screw, but I personally do. It will never loosen itself and cause the gun to be non-functional. A simple way of heading off the possibility of a screw backing out. Why would you want to take it apart anyway, if it's not broken or worn out? An ultrasonic cleaner will totally clean the assembly without taking the screw out.
Personally, I'd much rather strip and clean an A H Fox than a Savage Fox Model B. Maybe I've just been messing with Foxes long enough that they don't seem to be difficult.
Take care, Dustin.
May God bless America and those who defend her.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 6,877 Likes: 190
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 6,877 Likes: 190 |
Yep. That is the way people replace the firing pin in a Ljutic trap gun- using a drilling rod ground down to the correct shape. Guys used to do it at my place of work. Good luck.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,380 Likes: 701
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,380 Likes: 701 |
I've disassembled and cleaned mine numerous times, I have seven of them. I've never had the need to repair anything in a Fox action, with the exception of a silver soldering job to repair a broken guide pin on an ejector, which I did myself some 10-12 years ago. I've never had, nor heard of, anyone who had a Fox hammer/striker to break, and I've never seen a Fox action with "mushroomed out" firing pin holes from dry firing, though I have seen that on many other makes of doubles. I've asked old doublegunsmiths what make of vintage double has come into your shop for repairs the least in your career. "Fox" is the common reply, not because there weren't many made, Fox sold multiple times more Sterlingworths than Parker did Trojans. Part of the reason is so few moving parts in a Fox lock . . . . four, as compared to a Parker with sixteen per lock. You may not care for Fox's design in peening the threaded end of the yoke screw, but I personally do. It will never loosen itself and cause the gun to be non-functional. A simple way of heading off the possibility of a screw backing out. Why would you want to take it apart anyway, if it's not broken or worn out? An ultrasonic cleaner will totally clean the assembly without taking the screw out.
Personally, I'd much rather strip and clean an A H Fox than a Savage Fox Model B. Maybe I've just been messing with Foxes long enough that they don't seem to be difficult.
Take care, Dustin. Hi there Stan. Why would I want to completely take down an action when I do a strip and clean? Because that’s how it’s properly done. End of story. A sonic cleaner will do a good job, especially a commercial grade one like the one I use. It isn’t the end all be all in regards to a thorough cleaning!! The action will still need to be taken completely down to clean out the nooks and crannies. All kinds of stuff gets stuck in the brown rotary bolt/drum and that all needs to be cleaned out too. When I do a strip and clean, everything gets taken out, cleaned, polished and lubed. All of the old corrosion needs to be removed from each part too, that includes the top lever, the rotary bolt, the clevis, etc. I’ll stand by my thoughts on the peening of the clevis pin and say that the clevis pin being peened over is a wonky idea. I wonder if CSMC did that on the guns they made? I’d be curious to find that out. I wasn’t disparaging the Fox. I own them too. I don’t think it matters how many Fox’s a person owns. Owning a grundel of them doesn’t make one anymore knowledgeable on them than the next guy. I can’t say I have had many problems with a Fox either. The issues I’ve encountered have been with the rotary bolt, trigger pulls, ejectors and cracked stocks, etc. Fox must’ve know about the cracked stocks too because they decided to inlet a corrugated staple in the head of the stock (on some guns). Again, there’s nothing in a Fox action that would lead me to believe that it’s ok to dry fire. The similarities to the FP Greener are obvious, maybe the reason you don’t see many issues with the hammers and firing pins is due to the shear size of those parts. You don’t see many Greeners with those issues either.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 14,424 Likes: 2199
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 14,424 Likes: 2199 |
Dustin, far be it from me to question how far a proper strip and clean should be taken. You've learned under far more masterful craftsmen than I. Most of what I know about these old guns I've learned on my own, by trial and error. That said, I cannot see the reasoning behind wanting to remove the screw from the yoke on a Fox when doing a strip and clean, any more than I could see the reasoning behind wanting to disassemble a trigger plate by drifting out the axles to remove the individual triggers from the plate. It can all be cleaned completely in an ultrasonic, then dried and lubed. Would one take the top lever off of the spindle, too, in the case of one that is held by a screw, in order to say it was a proper strip and clean? Not saying it's wrong to do so, just that I can't see the reasoning behind it. My respect for your abilities is greater than you might think, but I don't always understand WHY some things are done.
I have no idea as to whether CSMC peened their yoke screws. Doesn't really matter to me as I know first hand of too many goof-ups CSMC has made with their guns. I wouldn't ever set their practices up as a standard of any kind.
One other point if I may, I wasn't implying that I know any more about Fox guns, because I own seven, than anyone who may own one, or none. It was simply my means of conveying my admiration and respect for them. I think the young man Ansley Herman Fox did quite well when he designed, and patented the design, at the ripe old age of 18. The fact that he borrowed some design ideas from Greener is just wisdom, IMO. Hell, at 18 the only thing that interested me was muscle cars and girls, with a dove shoot thrown in from time to time.
May God bless America and those who defend her.
|
|
1 member likes this:
Carcano |
|
|
|
|