S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
4 members (Der Ami, oskar, SKB, 1 invisible),
403
guests, and
5
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums10
Topics39,515
Posts562,237
Members14,590
|
Most Online9,918 Jul 28th, 2025
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 6,250
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 6,250 |
Just the thought of sitting in a tree stand and popping-off a 300 Weatherby/Winchester makes me shudder. The above rounds, maybe in the high plains, but not in the woods. Thats why we have different cartridges.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 9,409 Likes: 4
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 9,409 Likes: 4 |
Yep, they got really loco things out there now, like the .30-378, .375RUM. Who buys these things? City Slickers?  The .375H&H is already fast enough, but it becomes much tamer beast once one backs off from Mo by 200fps, or so. 
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,393
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,393 |
Lowell, with respect,I had a Remington 700 Classic in 300 H&H magnum, and I shot a heap of deer with it. I used Nosler Partition 180 gr bullets and I did not get the damage to the meat at all like I got with 30 cal cheap boat-tail bullets which broke up constantly. It's all in the projectile, in my humble opinion.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 419
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 419 |
there appears to be anywhere from 200-300fps difference in speed between a 300 H&H and a Weatherby so a H&H should be a little better with most bullets than a Weatherby
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 9,409 Likes: 4
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 9,409 Likes: 4 |
Notice when it comes to small-bore magnums it's nearly always 'I had...'? 
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 5
Boxlock
|
Boxlock
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 5 |
Nothing wrong with a 300 weatherby, it's a fine cartridge. If you're getting excessive meat damage then you're using the wrong bullet, not cartridge. Switch to a tougher bullet and you won't have the problem. A 300 weatherby will kill deer just as well at 10 feet as it will at 350 yards.
If you do go for the 300 wby, I hope you're a handloader. Weatherby factory ammo is $$$$$. Remington loaded it for a while, don't know if they still do. Handloading will really make this round shine. If you don't like the kick, just load it down to 30-06 levels and all is good. It's a really versitile round if you handload.
The sako 75 is a good rifle, just a little too heavy and "european pimp" for me. I prefer the M70 winchester (they chambered them in 300 wby for a few years). Remington also chambered them in their M700.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 997 Likes: 7
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 997 Likes: 7 |
I now shoot exclusively, 200 gr. Nozler Partitions in my 300 Win. Unless the deer is out there beyond 100 yds somewhere, I get excessive meat damage. I don't use the 300 on deer for this reason anymore. Although in this country one can get a 300 yd shot, more than likely the shot will be less than 100 yds, so I choose to use something less destructive on the meat.
Cameron Hughes
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 3
Boxlock
|
Boxlock
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 3 |
I have a Sako 75 in 270 win and it has been great. Mine is the standard model, non fluted barrel. It can feel heavy after a long day but not intolerable. When I purchased it I also purchased several brands and weights of ammo. Out of the box it shot 3/4" groups using 130 gr vital shock w/ balistic tips. Good enough for me. Nothing shot over 1 1/4 groups. I have never had any problem with the Sako what so ever.
I purchased this gun because I got tired of getting knocked senseless from my 300 rum model 700. I still have the 300 and often think of selling it.
I would advise anyone thinking of one of the magnum calibers to really think about it. Ammo is expensive and hard to find. I have had a bullet explode on impact on a close range shot on a moose. I found that as time went on I began to develop a flinch that still haunts me.
My thinking has changed from "use enough gun" to use just enough gun for a clean kill.
Dave
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,393
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,393 |
Well,I try not to shoot them in the meat with anything, Broadside on through the ribs, you will not ruin any meat with any calibre. Personally I do not have any small bore magnums as I have no use for them. I have a Mannlicher Schoenaur in 6.5MS, a 338-06, a 9.3x62 and a Russian single shot take-down in 308 Win which shoots really well for a $300 dollar gun, new. If I was allowed to keep only one rifle it would be the 338-06, an eminently sensible cartridge. Mike
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 997 Likes: 7
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 997 Likes: 7 |
Mike, I had a fleeting idea at one time while living in AK., for a hunting rifle, and for possible bear protection to look into the possibility of modifying an M-1 Garand to the 338-06. I figured that would give me some great firepower for pretty much anything I encountered. Kind of a crazy idea, I know, but the 338-06 looked like a sweet round. I ended up building up an old Rem Model 30 I had into a 35 Whelan Improved. Which I like alot! CH
Cameron Hughes
|
|
|
|
|