I agree with MP. While Lindner marks show up on several other US maker/retailer's guns, many of those guns appear to have been heavily worked in the US. These were real "makers" (e.g, Schaefer, Donn, etc.), not just retailers (like SD&G) slapping their name on a Lindner made gun.
To George's questions -
1 - Is this a Lindner gun?
Short answer. I don't know.
Long answer - I have some thoughts. What follows is my opinion - I do not believe Heinrich A. Lindner built that hammer gun. To make a very long story short, there exists a block of very early Prussian Dalys (#1 - low 200s) that do not bear any HAL mark (crown over crossed pistols at that time). They do not bear any other maker's marks though they occasionally do show some actioner and barrelman initials. At the SAME TIME these guns were being made, HAL was making guns and these bear his mark. The "concurrent production" is based on the A&D patent use numbers found in the breech face of the hammerless guns in this same serial number range.
While these guns (low numbered very early Prussian Dalys) bear many mechanical and stylistic similarities with HAL made and marked guns, it does not make sense (to me) why Heinrich Lindner would have marked some of his guns and not others made for the same retailer at the same time.
I do have a pet theory though on who might have made this gun. You can probably answer "the who" for yourself <g>. Who would have been the person most likely to have turned over to young Heinrich the very lucrative work for SD&G in the US? This would be a person in the gun trade, a master gun maker who would provide young Heinrich access to the same actioners, barrel makers, etc. that he used? This person would have a vested interest in helping young Heinrich do well.
I'll cut to the chase. I think it was Heinrich's dad, George Lindner. Again, this is just my hypothesis and totally unproven. While it does pass the initial smell test (Georg was a master gunmaker in Suhl), it needs lots of vetting and research. To be honest, there could be many other logical explanations, this just seemed to be a likely avenue for further research.
2 - Date estimate?
My best estimate is very late 1870s to very early 1880s. This is based on the gun's features, markings, and serial number.
Ken
Last edited by Ken Georgi; 07/29/08 09:02 AM.