S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 members (dukxdog, Birdog, 1 invisible),
287
guests, and
6
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums10
Topics38,929
Posts550,826
Members14,459
|
Most Online1,344 Apr 29th, 2024
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 50
Sidelock
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 50 |
I have heard plenty of arguments as to which is the best American double made. Any suggestions on the worst. I am going to open on Davenports. I haven't seen a lot but most I have seen have a multitude of broken or malfunctioning parts even in decent shape otherwise.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,966 Likes: 96
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,966 Likes: 96 |
To start listing them from the bottom would be dangerous ground indeed to tread on. Much better to argue about the best while we're all winking and grinning at each other, knowing they were all good--just different. Most American shotguns were built to a price point and given a level playing field the production of Parker, Fox, Ithaca, Lefever, Baker, etc., are all wonderful guns. By the same token, those who made guns for the low end of the market did the best they could with the little they were being paid.
No sir, leave me outa this one....
John McCain is my war hero.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 640
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 640 |
This is a loaded question indeed. I feel there are highs and lows in each company. For instance, I have a Ithaca 7E that is one of the finest guns period, and then I've seen a 4E which must have rolled off the line on a Friday. Foxes were all over the place. Smiths and Parkers more even keel.
So that leaves us with Fox...Beautiful product, financial mess so had to cut corners (especially engraving). That takes Fox out of the top.
Next is Ithaca. IMO, they put out some VERY nice guns in the Crass and Lewis era but when they changed the Flues the frames were strong looking but in reality, weaker. Also, just not very good looking.
So it boiles down to Fox and Ithaca as the bottom 2 of the big 4. And I think that (and I could be wrong) but most anyone would rather own a Fox than an Ithaca.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 6,250
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 6,250 |
Gun for gun, imho, AH Fox guns bring more money than LC Smith guns. That'll put them breathing at the heels of Parker Bros. which seemed to be played out at this moment!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 965 Likes: 13
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 965 Likes: 13 |
Imperial Arms Co. gets my vote for worst gun, only because I was suckered into buying one that was misrepresented as something else. Total junk.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 6,250
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 6,250 |
Prolly the best of the worst are the SAC guns - but they bring out the heartland farmer in me and reminds me of our better past.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 2,754 Likes: 105
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 2,754 Likes: 105 |
I will stick my head over the parapet on this one but I will state firstly that I do not see a lot of American doubles on this side of the Atlantic. I will cast my vote for the Winchester model 24. at least as far as ugliness goes. Still, if I could find a good example I would add it to my collection. I have only ever come across one, which was in well used condition. Now I have probably upset some Winchester Collectors so I will apologise in advance. Lagopus.....
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,602 Likes: 14
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,602 Likes: 14 |
From what I am told and have read, the 24 is durable and dependable. That, having been said, I agree with your opinion, lagopus, that it is probably the ugliest American SXS ever made and I can think of no reason that I would want to own one.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 6,250
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 6,250 |
For ugly, I'll go with the Englishmen's Masu Bros gun pictured on p29 of Boothroyd's Sl&Bl.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 11,464 Likes: 133
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 11,464 Likes: 133 |
The 24's right up there in taking the title of ugliest girl at the dance, but it has very shootable dimensions and is actually a pretty darned solid gun.
When you stop to think about it, American gunmakers simply haven't turned out many truly crappy doubles. Some may have the dynamics of a poorly balanced 2x4, but as tools--and for the most part, that's what the inexpensive ones were built to be--they were pretty decent.
|
|
|
|
|