I haven't received mine yet and am not too anxious for it. While the photos are always great, they're all basically the same. And what can be said about the editorial content--good writing should have a beginning, middle, and end. There should be a point to the story. Usually the DGJ ignores the basics and prints the most useless, awkward stuff I've ever read. It doesn't even seem that the editor has read and corrected the submitted copy. Hate to be so hard on what many consider to be the finest publication in the field but it falls far short of what it could easily be. Having said all that (and relieved my frustration) I'll eagerly scan through it admiring the pretty pictures. No hate mail please, this is just my lone opinion.
