To respond to the original thread, let me first say I read neither the original article, the reply or the re-reply. As I understand it though the writer gave info which the responder felt dis-credited pioneers in the facts presented & courtesly pointed this out, giving easily checked references in the process. The writer then "Arrogantly" responds with a put down to the responder. This I find to be totally unacceptable & feel the reader has the right to have his responce as public as the original. I note the only ones who seem to disagree are "Some", not all, other writers. I will note these writers who feel this way & not purchase publications which will give support to them. One in particular had already been previously written off in my book.

Miller/TN
I Didn't Say Everything I Said, Yogi Berra