S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
2 members (FlyChamps, RayC),
465
guests, and
5
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums10
Topics39,492
Posts562,047
Members14,585
|
Most Online9,918 Jul 28th, 2025
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 6,881
Sidelock
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 6,881 |
MP Sadly Deceased as of 2/17/2014
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 422 Likes: 1
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 422 Likes: 1 |
I'll be the first one to prove himself lacking in both knowledge and good sense. I think it's a Springfield NRA-type Sporter that has been restocked by a very good stockmaker, but I do not know who. It is probably one of the double heat treated actions. The Lyman 48 has a long slide. Since there is no telescope and the bolt handle has not been altered, the rifle probably dates from the 1920s. I would take out the bolt, check the bore under a good light and mumble something about "low number action, and not set up for a scope" and offer the chap $575. If he asked for more, I would go up to $650 and not feel as if I were too much of a gambler. If the bargaining went beyond $800, the owner could continue to own it.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,153
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,153 |
The straight bolt handle to me indicates a low number bolt and ergo a low number receiver; immaterial to me for shooting but a good bargaining point with an owner who doesn't value them. The issue front sight indicates an issue barrel, possibly another bargaining point with an unknowledgeable owner. The long-slide 48 and the European-type sling swivels are also indicators of an early rifle; all in all it appears to be very possibly an early NRA sporter as already suggested. The stock doesn't have the early reinforcing side panels but does have an early-type schnabel tip, and appears to be extremely well made. I don't believe it's a modified issue stock, rather it appears to be a plain but well-made replacement done by an expert.
Without seeing the details up close and personal, I'd offer at least $500 and maybe up to $1000 or more if the details proved interesting. It looks like a sleeper. I'd look for locating pins on the bolt sleeve first; if present, they'd indicate expert or at least knowledgegable workmanship in the conversion. Interesting, regards, Joe
You can lead a man to logic but you can't make him think. NRA Life since 1976. God bless America!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 465
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 465 |
Looks like a nicely made rifle and worthy of purchase. Comparing pictures the lines are nearly identical to your G&H .400 Whelen. Too bad itisn't marked. It would be interesting to see just how carefully the fine details and inletting are done. Another rifle for your unidentified gunsmith file.
Jerry Liles
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 14,447 Likes: 278
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 14,447 Likes: 278 |
I would get it home, lock the doors, and worry about who made it later. When they look like this one, I don't even try to determine the caliber before I write the check.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 3,205
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 3,205 |
Yeah, Bill, I agree, that pretty much of a no brainer. There is just something special about a well done Springfield Sporter with a Lyman 48 sight, no matter who built it.
I am lucky enough to have my Dad's ole Springfield Sporter built by The Rifle Ranch in Prescott, AZ back in the late '40s.
Last edited by Don Moody; 11/09/08 11:15 AM.
Ole Cowboy
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 6,881
Sidelock
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 6,881 |
Information I should have included. The barrel is original and it's still a 30-06 , it has a perfect bore and dated SA 9-16, the action is Springfield No. 5362XX. The buttplate is the typical German one but without the trapdoor.
MP Sadly Deceased as of 2/17/2014
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,153
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,153 |
The grip and comb nose resemble the G&H style(s) and the schnabel and cutoff treatment (if G&H) suggest an early fabrication date. To me it resembles more and more an NRA sporter stocked by G&H in their early years. Whatever, it's obviously a very fine rifle and I wish it was mine. Regards, Joe
You can lead a man to logic but you can't make him think. NRA Life since 1976. God bless America!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 625
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 625 |
I'm with Bill; buy it,then find out who made it. With the hints from Joe and some personal experience, I vote for Seymore Griffin!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 11
Boxlock
|
Boxlock
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 11 |
Michael, This one is hard to hold my tongue on. Of course I have an advantage on this one. Clues: We don't have many availble. Lineage: Wundhammer Good Luck. gary duffey
|
|
|
|
|