Originally Posted By: italiansxs
I just want to remind everyone here that Sherman Bells testing was hardly up to scientific standards and,as far as I'm concerned,didn't really prove anything. I love the look of damascus barrels and feel this was a real art form but I also recognize the inherent weakness in this type of construction.


I would like to see actual scientific evidence that damascus barrels are inherently weaker, and if so, by how much.