|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
2 members (Argo44, earlyriser),
667
guests, and
3
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums10
Topics39,496
Posts562,075
Members14,586
|
Most Online9,918 Jul 28th, 2025
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,026
Sidelock
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,026 |
There's a pretty beat Hi-wall .22 Musket for sale on the http://www.rugerforum.com "classifieds" section that is for $775. Many pictures. Don't know if it is a good deal (and I don't have the bread right now), but it might be worth a look if you are in the mood for a Hi-wall project. Just sayin'....
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,185 Likes: 67
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,185 Likes: 67 |
Were the .22 HW's all small shank guns?
My problem lies in reconciling my gross habits with my net income. - Errol Flynn
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 629 Likes: 1
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 629 Likes: 1 |
All of the musket actions I have worked with have been large shank. Perhaps Mr. Steele can shed some light.
FWIW, that looks to be a pretty nice action. In fact it is almost too nice to take the rifle apart. I wonder how the bore is...
Glenn
There is no sacrifice too great for someone else to make.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 778 Likes: 40
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 778 Likes: 40 |
That makes me chuckle! I've always wondered why the wood "shrinks" and the edges always round over where they meet the metal during this "shrinkage"? http://www.rugerforum.com/phpBB/viewtopic.php?t=47959
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 66
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 66 |
Looks like a good candidate for being an organ donor! Barrel is too rough on outside for anything but complete re-polish or replacement, wood nothing to brag about, and the rear sight is missing (and quite expensive to replace.) It looks like someone has started polishing on the receiver (left side) as well. The good news is that the muskets ALL had large barrel shanks (AFAIK) and the receiver itself doesn't look too badly pitted to polish out the rest of the way. I would look at it as an action waiting to be built into a nice custom 'wall, but YMMV!!
Froggie
It ain't easy being green!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,026
Sidelock
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,026 |
I'm with the amphib. Wish I had the $$ to at least make an offer. Story of my life....all dressed up and not even the cab fare.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 704
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 704 |
My recollection from Campbell's books is that the Winder musket hiwall actions are soft, but are nontheless immensely strong.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,185 Likes: 67
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,185 Likes: 67 |
If one was going to use it for the basis of a custom could it be hardened?
My problem lies in reconciling my gross habits with my net income. - Errol Flynn
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,153
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,153 |
Sure, but probably wouldn't need it from the strength standpoint. The basic high wall conservative design and healthy dimensions go a long way toward ensuring strength & safety even when dead soft but a case-coloring would add lots of appeal as well as some wear protection. Regards, Joe
You can lead a man to logic but you can't make him think. NRA Life since 1976. God bless America!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 21
Boxlock
|
Boxlock
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 21 |
I have a Takedown 30-40 Krag built on a original Takedown Winder Musket action. Have shot it extensively with stiff Jacketed bullet loads. No signs of any problems. The Barrel is an original Takedown that came to me with the Takedown ring with very good bore. I built it as a Deer Rifle and shot it quite a bit and have used it for hunting in Maine as a backup. So far no signs of trouble. Many Winder muskets were rebarreled to modern high pressure Woodchuck calibers. Regards, FITZ. 
|
|
|
|
|
|