|
|
|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 members (oskar, liverwort, SKB, 3 invisible),
992
guests, and
3
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Forums10
Topics39,644
Posts563,688
Members14,602
| |
Most Online9,918 Jul 28th, 2025
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 213 Likes: 3
Sidelock
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 213 Likes: 3 |
Need some input,
I need a new gun, which everyone on this board can certainly understand. The gun I need will be a hunting gun, shooting everything that flies, from prairie grouse to geese and likely sporting clays. It won't be my only, or for that matter my primary, hunting gun. Don't want or particularily care if it has collector value. The dilema is a lifelong desire for a Parker. I've looked at any number of Parkers, including Repro's and just never seem to find exactly what I want. I'm about to give up on the Parker (unless my Powerball numbers match the next drawing!) and order an RBL, 12ga., 30" bbls., double triggers, beavertail forearm and straight grip. I've about convinced myself I'll buy more for $3k than I'd ever do on a Parker. Your thoughts?
Steve
"Every one must believe in something, I believe I'll go hunting today."
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 5,021
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 5,021 |
RBL, at least you can get stock dimensions that are somewhat close to your shooting and/ or hunting style. Plus the RBL can handle modern nontoxic ammunition…..a growing concern for even upland game hunters.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 640
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 640 |
Yes the RBL probably is more practicle but I would buy the Parker. I can't warm up the newer guns even tho they are nice indeed. But life is short and I want an old classic at my side when I'm afield. It is just better that way IMHO.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,983
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,983 |
If you shop carefully, I believe you can find a Parker for $3000 that will be a more desirable gun than a $3000 RBL. JMO, of course.
> Jim Legg <
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,478 Likes: 54
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,478 Likes: 54 |
For the situation you describe, it's RBL.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 9,409 Likes: 4
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 9,409 Likes: 4 |
as versatile modern shooter the rbl wins hands down. the fact that manufacturer is still in business and makes them is certainly big part of it. it isn't the only choice but it's a good one.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 292
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 292 |
I have owned & used both. If I had to choose one for an all purpose gun, I'd go with the more modern RBL.
A Springer Spaniel, a 6# double and a fair day to hunt.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 627 Likes: 46
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 627 Likes: 46 |
I've owned both Parker repro's and a launch edition RBL. The repro's are still in my safe and the RBL is long gone.
I looked at the RBL 12 & 16 gauges at the Tulsa show. I'll give galazans credit where it's due and that's all the RBL's they had at the show were eye catchers with real nice wood. But with that said I'm really glad I didn't order a 12 or 16ga RBL. They felt big and clunky, had the same issues of burnt checkering,Etc. You can do much better with $3000.00 if you shop around.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 262 Likes: 4
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 262 Likes: 4 |
"The dilema is a lifelong desire for a Parker."
That is a very telling statement. The RBL is unlikely to satisfy a life long desire. It is therefore most likely going to come up short in your mind. You will be reminded of that when you finally see a nice Parker for sale (always seems to happen right after buying a new gun) and especially if you are in the company of a nice Parker in the hands of a hunting partner.
I would rather have the Parker, even if that meant having to compromise on the BTFE or straight grip.
Remember life is short, I would fulfill my desire.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,935
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,935 |
All this really proves is that man cannot live with only one gun.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|