S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
Forums10
Topics39,496
Posts562,070
Members14,586
|
Most Online9,918 Jul 28th, 2025
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 158 Likes: 3
Sidelock
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 158 Likes: 3 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,672 Likes: 4
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,672 Likes: 4 |
Neat rifle. How does she shoot?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 158 Likes: 3
Sidelock
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 158 Likes: 3 |
Neat rifle. How does she shoot? Thanks for the compliment, but sorry, I'm not one of these guys who has to shoot everything he owns. I haven't shot this one and this is typical for me.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 174
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 174 |
Boltman, When you call this a transitional rifle, was it the transition from military to sporting? This is the only Ross you have shown with a military looking hand guard piece around the rear sight. Also, which is the Harris lever, A or B. What is the one that is not the Harris lever? 
AKA garyg, depending on how confused and which computer Im on.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 158 Likes: 3
Sidelock
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 158 Likes: 3 |
Grogel - I'll bet if this was a Savage, you wouldn't be asking these technical questions ;). The front lever is the "Harris lever" which you press down as you load the magazine. It takes the pressure off so you can drop them easily. The lever by the trigger is a magazine cut-off. You click that and it hold the cartridges down so the rifle can be single-loaded and as you cycle the bolt, the top cartridge isn't stripped off. The "transition" aspect of this rifle is not related to a transition to military. Rather, it is a transition from the M1900 action to the M1903 action. When I get a chance, I will post pictures of a M1903 actioned sporter (made in Quebec).
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,672 Likes: 4
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,672 Likes: 4 |
Well, if you haven't shot it, what was their reputation back when they were actively used? Looks like a light,handy rifle to carry around and if everything else was "up to snuff"....
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 158 Likes: 3
Sidelock
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 158 Likes: 3 |
I don't think there were enough of these rifles made for them to have a reputation. But yes, it is a light handy rifle that has the unfortunate burden of being very "collectable." The .256 Mannlicher cartridge was a fine deer size animal cartridge and for the times, was quite the high velocity number. Even for today, it would be a fine little cartridge. I know many consider it sad if not a travesty that this rifle will likely never go hunting again. And then there's the other camp that would consider it a travesty for it to be carried in the field again.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,672 Likes: 4
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,672 Likes: 4 |
Yes, there is no replacing vintage equipment once it is used up or damaged.I understand why you don't shoot it.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 704
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 704 |
The .256 Mannlicher was the rimmed counterpart of the 6.5x54 Mannlicher-Schoenauer.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 158 Likes: 3
Sidelock
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 158 Likes: 3 |
Mark, this rifle is marked, "6.5 M/M 256 RIMLESS" I see in the Ross Rifle Story, they list this model rifle as having been chambered in .256 Mannlicher. As it is a rimless case, I am sure is is chambered in the 6.5 x 54 Mannlicher-Schoenauer. That cartridge was designed in 1900. This rifle was made in 1902, I believe. As Sir Charles was very future-minded, it would make sense he would choose a new and recently developed cartridge.
|
|
|
|
|