I may be wrong on this but as I understand it the AG's opinion is just that - an opinion. It may be cause to pursue prosecution, but it is not the law. Precedent to substantiate it would have to be obtained thru the adjudication process with the AG providing justification for whatever case is at hand. And the circumstances can certainly be argued. Until that is done, shooting pigeons is still legal. And you can put anything you want in a Barnaby. No, the AG won't fit.
JMO of course I'm not an attorney
WtS
I agree. However, I don't know whether or not that a case has ever been prosecuted and a conviction made. If it has, the precedence would be established. If no case has been tried, the opinion serves as a basis for law enforcement to determine action for citations or arrest. I was just assuming the worst case that it had been established thru a previous case that it was illegal. Certainly, the average hunter I've met believes P-shoots are illegal in CA. But, then the average Californian voted for Obama.
Next time you're in a McDonalds, ask for the Obama value pak. That's where you pick what you want and the guy behind you pays for it.
Well the "cash for clunkers" program did have a positive aspect...it got 95% of the vehicles with "Obama for President" bumper stickers off the road.
