Although I haven't handled one of the Boddington rifles in 7x57 (the "Leopard"), I have inspected several of them in other calibers, and am underwhelmed to say the least. In my opinion, the Boddington Series is a worthy concept that is severely let down by Ruger's mediocre production quality.
From what I could see, the main differences with the Boddington Series is the matte blue finish, ivory bead front sight, cut checkering, and semi-gloss stock finish. The Boddington also comes with a black recoil pad instead of the standard Ruger red-orange pad, and possibly a different pistol grip cap. Although strictly cosmetic changes, they result in a much more subdued and tasteful end product compared to the standard No. 1.
However, these virtues are all undermined by the appalling fit and finish on the examples that I have handled. Like many modern, high-volume manufacturers, Ruger has taken CNC production techniques to the extreme, and has entirely eliminated hand finishing. As a result, there are sharp, unfinished edges evident on many of the machined metal surfaces, and the wood to metal fit shows significant gaps and overlaps. In addition, wood selection on the Boddington rifles appears to be standard grade i.e. not worthy of a limited production rifle. Furthermore, after all these years one would think that Ruger could figure a way to securely attach a quarter rib without a bunch of unsightly exposed screws.
Lest anyone get the wrong impression, the Ruger No. 1 is one of my favorite modern production rifles, and I bless Bill Ruger for having the wisdom and courage to have put it into production. However, like many classic gun enthusiasts I tend to see the No. 1 more for what it could be, than what it is. Consequently, instead of spending my money on a new Boddington, I would rather find an older No. 1 in 7x57 with decent wood and then spend the time to refine and refinish it in the classic British style - the same money with a more satisfying result.
Can you say ".275 Rigby"?
Cheers,
Peconga in Boise, Idaho
