|
|
|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 members (DD Grouser, Drew Hause, Argo44, canvasback, Mike Harrell, 1 invisible),
1,224
guests, and
3
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Forums10
Topics39,663
Posts563,890
Members14,605
| |
Most Online9,918 Jul 28th, 2025
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,609 Likes: 14
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,609 Likes: 14 |
The exact distance between firing pins (strikers) determines the frame size of a Parker. From 1" an increase or decrease of every 1/16" will determine a different frame size.
Last edited by DAM16SXS; 06/28/10 03:47 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 245
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 245 |
DAM16SXS,
Research made by C. Price and S. Fjestad, on actual Parker guns, published in "Parker Gun Identification & Serialization" (p. 45), shows the following distance between strikers: Frame 000 (13/16"); Frame 00 (15/16"); Frame 0 (1"); Frame 1/2 (1 1/16"); Frame 1 (1 1/16"); Frame 1 1/2 (1 1/8"); Frame 2 (1 1/8"); Frame 3 (1 3/16"); Frame 4 (1 1/4"); Frame 5 (1 5/16"); Frame 6 (1 3/8") and Frame 7 (1 7/16").
According to this research frames 1/2 and 1, and frames 1 1/2 and 2 share the same distance between strikers. This tells something about the (later) origin of frames 1/2 and 1 1/2. All the other frame sizes have incremental distances (1/16") between strikers right as you mention, but one: Frame 000 that goes down 2/16".
Regards.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,609 Likes: 14
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,609 Likes: 14 |
You're right ejsxs. I was being too general in my statement while only attempting to give a broad 'rule of thumb'. Thanks for clarifying that which I clumsily omitted.
Best, Dean
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,935
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,935 |
The #1 frame is probably Parker's best size frame - it fits the hand well without feeling too large or small. I'd bet if you blindfolded 100 guys and handed them a #0, #1, and #2 frame they'd choose the #1 most of the time.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 245
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 245 |
I wish CSMC had offered 16 Ga Parker barrels for 1/2 frames. They did only for 0 frames.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,935
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,935 |
What would the market be for that? If they only made 250 1/2 frame guns, and probably 5% or less of those have owners who might be interested? I doubt CSMC wants to tool up to sell 10 barrels.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 245
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 245 |
You are right, I bet that the 0 frame barrels (in 16, 20 and 28 Ga) had a wider market.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 455
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 455 |
The last I knew the number of 1/2 frames identified through the research process were in the low 30's. As many know much changed within the PGCA and I do not know where that count is now if it was even shared or has been maintained. I did read on the PGCA BBS a while back the number low 50's but I do not know how reliable that was as I don't recall the source. I do know that the 1/2 Frame is the only Parker frame that was identified by size. It was marked on the interior surface under the top tang.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 14,493 Likes: 291
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 14,493 Likes: 291 |
ejsxs, your request is not as off base as the other posters imply. A set of 16 gauge barrels that would fit a 1/2 frame will also fit a #1 frame. As I posted earlier, I have a 1/2 frame gun with 16 gauge #1 frame barrels. It works just fine.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 245
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 245 |
Eightbore,
more on what you have mentioned, aside from working well, how is the outside looking? No sharp edges?
Maybe 16 Ga. Parker barrels fitting in 1/2 and 1 frames would be not a far fetched proposition to CSMC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|