|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forums10
Topics40,138
Posts571,063
Members14,674
| |
Most Online19,682 Mar 28th, 2026
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 6,881
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 6,881 |
At one time I had a set of three K's a K-22, K-32 and K-38.
One day my friend and I were comparing our K-32’s both had about 98% finish and we noticed that they were consecutive numbered. I bought mine used in Alaska, he bought his new in North Dakota.
At the time we decided that the guns were worth $200 each and thought they should be together, we flipped a coin and I lost. Please don’t tell me what a K-32 is selling for these days ‘-).
MP Sadly Deceased as of 2/17/2014
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 262
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 262 |
Michael, I was lucky enough to once win a flip like that when I found the case for a one of a kind Webley that a friend owned. Yes, we are still friends.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,796 Likes: 31
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,796 Likes: 31 |
I bought a used Colt OMM .22lr not long time ago and it's one of my favourite shooters. With kind regards, Jani
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,213 Likes: 83
Sidelock
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,213 Likes: 83 |
Thanks for all the encouragement gentlemen. There's room enough in the safe for more than one, right now I think I am concentrating on finding an OMM and a 1946-1957 K-22. These both seem to run in the $500-1000 depending on condition, seem fair?
I had some confusion about how the K-22's are marked so I called S&W today and was told they only had a K and a serial number until 1957 and then they have a 17-X on the frame. Sound correct?
Steve, I saw your 17-3, but would like something a bit older. Would love to find a K-22 from 1955, the year I came out of the factory!
Will let you know how this shakes out.
Anyone have a good thing to say about the Colt .22 Diamondback?
thanks, Rob
My problem lies in reconciling my gross habits with my net income. - Errol Flynn
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,153
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,153 |
I had some confusion about how the K-22's are marked so I called S&W today and was told they only had a K and a serial number until 1957 and then they have a 17-X on the frame. Sound correct? Yes. I like the fit & finish of the prewar Colts better than the S&Ws but the Colt grip doesn't fit my hand nearly as well as the S&Ws do. IMO the little prewar 'kit gun' that SDH made and showed us is the neatest thing I've seen in a long time, I'm envious! Regards, Joe
You can lead a man to logic but you can't make him think. NRA Life since 1976. God bless America!
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 625
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 625 |
For S & W Bekeart models, take a look at the current Amoskeag Auction, Lots 262 and 293. I think they are too light, but interesting! I have serial #2 of this series, with A O Niedner, Malden, Mass barrel.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 702 Likes: 72
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 702 Likes: 72 |
Rob, JD and everyone else, it appears I misspoke and I apologize. Rob, after reading your last post about when the Mod 17 was stamped on the revolvers I had to go check mine and see what I actually had and if the date of manufacture I was told, 1947, was or was not incorrect. My revolver is not stamped Mod. 17, just a K 71XX on the barrel beneath the extractor rod and a KO 278XX on the frame behind the crane. As the numbers aren't matching does that mean this revolver has possibly been rebarrelled? I'm not at all familiar with S & W's numbering.
Vic
Vic
NRA Benefactor 2008 NRA Patron 2007 NRA Endowment 1996 NRA Life 1988
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,443 Likes: 42
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,443 Likes: 42 |
Michael, Terry, The S&W fanatics think any inscription not done at the factory and documented in the "letter" greatly diminishes the value of the revolver! I'm sure you fellows feel quite differently! A K-32 wouldn't mean anything to me except trading stock, Very Good Trading Stock! Thanks JD, it shoots good too! At one time the Colts were of great interest to me, but... I've only a few left and have found myself selling to acquire Smiths. Either in .22 could be greatly entertaining. New Service .45 Colt and S&W 2cd .44HE  I anyone really interested in S&W the Standard Catalog of S&W is a complicated, but VERY informative book, necessary even! I bought the OP Neal and Jinks S&W book for $325 about 20+ years ago (K-32 price), but use the SCSW now. Vic, serial numbers on early guns are on the butt, bottom of barrel, ejector star, under rear sight, back of cylinder under star... inside crane has assembly numbers, later put model number there M-17-3, etc. Your correct on #71xx being 1947 (about) only a letter confirms.
Last edited by SDH-MT; 07/20/10 09:14 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,484 Likes: 58
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,484 Likes: 58 |
If you like longer barrels, I think the S&W would be easier to find. I have 17's in various configurations, including one with 8" barrel (as I recall). Very nice piece.
Not exactly what you asked about, but my favorite .22 is a Ruger Super Single Six. Too new for you, but a nice shooter.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 704
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 704 |
Terry mentioned the H&R Ultra Sportsman. I have had a Model 777 for many years. This is an extraordinary revolver, single short action, and short cylinder the length of a .22LR cartridge. The bullet does not have to jump the length of a .38 Special to get into the barrel, as on a K22. Not many were made. I also have a K22 that I bought used around 1950, do not know exactly which model, but I used to shoot in the mid 90s timed and rapid double action on the old National Capital indoor range in DC. Remarkably smooth trigger. I am also fond of a Walther PPK with dural frame although of course I cannot hit nearly as well with it as with the revolvers.
|
|
|
|
|