S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 members (1 invisible),
251
guests, and
4
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums10
Topics38,636
Posts547,234
Members14,433
|
Most Online1,344 Apr 29th, 2024
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 10,974 Likes: 209
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 10,974 Likes: 209 |
Lagopus: Guineas, it was that for which I was grasping. I'd say units of distance of my forte with a rod, pole & perch being the same thing. But if you want to get CONfused, try to convert the Vara without knowing the units of the original intent. Interesting how folks, farmers for the most part, were able to covert from a perimeter or 2 sides of a tract to acres. It is possible that the conversion was based on the fact that 2 furlongs by 2 perches was 1 acre. Thanks for the info.
Kind Regards,
Raimey rse
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 2,738 Likes: 97
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 2,738 Likes: 97 |
ellenbr, glad I hit the right note with guineas. They are seldom used in prices these days but were commonly encountered pre decimal. Farmers seem to have an entirely different system altogether as with scores for pigs. Sheeep counting has its own unique system too. Lagopus.....
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 12,743
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 12,743 |
Also there was the Hundredweight. This rolled over to the US in some instances, wrought iron Blacksmith's anvils being one which comes to mind. These were normally stamped on their sides with 3 sets of numbers, 1st hundredwt's (112lbs), next ¼ hundredwt's (28lbs) & lastly any remaining lbs. Thus an anvil stamped 1 2 3 Would weigh 112 + 56 + 3 = 171 lbs total.
Miller/TN I Didn't Say Everything I Said, Yogi Berra
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 2,738 Likes: 97
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 2,738 Likes: 97 |
Never thought of that; the fact you don't use hundredweights and stones. We weigh human bodies in stones (14 pound to the stone) and pounds not just pounds as you do. Since we went into the European Union though they want everything to go metric. The latest is that they want us to buy eggs by weight (grams) not by the dozen or half dozen. Maps are the oddest as heights are in metres and depths in the sea are still given in feet.
Getting off topic. Sorry! Lagopus.....
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,393
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,393 |
Lagopus, you have only scratched the surface of Old English premetric measurements used in the seed trade. I have before me a lovely copper-bound wooden measure used by seed merchants for selling seed by volume. It is stamped VR so it's Victorian, inspector's stamp, when filled with seed peas, for example, after filling the measure would be "struck" that is, using a wood "striker" 1" in diameter, the striker passed over the edge of the measure and levelling the seed in the measure. Now for the confusing part, the wood is branded:
1/8 bushel, 1/2 peck. (So a peck is a 1/4 bushel).
I have a collection of these wooden measures, starting at 1/2 pint all the way up to a nice 1912 half bushel. I never did find a bushel (English, not US) before I emigrated to Canada. And the hundredweight of my youth weighed 108 pounds (lbs) I have my grandfather's farm records from the 1920s, makes interesting reading, if not confusing. I plan on donating all this stuff to the local Faculty of Agriculture as my kids are not a bit interested, and if I die before doing that it will all go to the dump, probably Mike
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,164 Likes: 11
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,164 Likes: 11 |
Mike, In my youth we farmed acres of potatoes,these spuds were packed in 100wt =112 lbs;sacks.There were 20 of these in the english ton which =2240lbs. The ton U.S.A. = 2000 lbs;this difference in the designation of the ton has lead to some under estimating the the rating of English proof pressure marks. For example a British proof test marked 3 tons per square inch = 6720 pounds per square inch and not 6000pounds per square inch!
Roy Hebbes
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 250 Likes: 1
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 250 Likes: 1 |
The Peck measurment perked my ears up. As a boy in North Carolina, we had numerous Peck buckets around the farm and,if I remember right, some 2 peck baskcts.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 95
Sidelock
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 95 |
Luckily my request for Jeffery records was replied and yesterday I received in my mail a letter by the owner of records in USA with a copy of original ledger page. The ledger entry says that date of manufacture was 5 April 1928. Here is scan of that page, Magnified scan of entry Please comment on "made by", strange order of dates and the difference of handwriting with other entries.
Last edited by Saad; 08/04/10 04:57 AM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 10,974 Likes: 209
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 10,974 Likes: 209 |
I don't know the dates are odd as the entry is day/month/year(not month/day/year) and the next column is price. Maybe the original ledger entry person/transcriber took the week off and his/her replacement had a small deviation from the common one??
Kind Regards,
Raimey rse
Last edited by ellenbr; 08/08/10 08:25 AM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 173 Likes: 3
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 173 Likes: 3 |
In most of the world the proper order is Day/Month/Year the USofA makes a bit confusing when doing business out side of the states by using Month/Day/Year. Cheers, Laurie
falling block
|
|
|
|
|