S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 members (1 invisible),
202
guests, and
4
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums10
Topics38,935
Posts550,891
Members14,460
|
Most Online1,344 Apr 29th, 2024
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 398 Likes: 19
Sidelock
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 398 Likes: 19 |
Saw the Webley Patent for a round breech block action some time ago - Translation-bored. Decided to try something similar, but sorta Alex Henry style.
Got some bits and started working. Can some one post a couple photos of "progress" to date for me? Many thanks
And please, only one snide remark per person.
Dumb, but learning...Prof Em, BSc(ME), CAE (FYI)
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 7,088 Likes: 462
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 7,088 Likes: 462 |
send me the pics and I will post them for you.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 625 Likes: 1
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 625 Likes: 1 |
The old circular breechblock has been around for a looooong, long time. The late Frank DeHaas's 'Vault lock' design is somewhat similar.
Please be aware that should you make one of these type of actions, they are a very weak design and should not be used for anything more powerful than a typical Black Powder 'Rook Rifle' cartridge. I would even be reluctant to touch off a 32/20 with a Black Powder load in one.
That's the reason why there were so few made by anyone. They simply weren't up to the job.
Using modern rounds will batter the rear of the action so hard it will soon deform or split.
Harry
Biology is the only science where multiplication can be achieved by division.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 7,088 Likes: 462
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 7,088 Likes: 462 |
I know of an H&H built .240 flanged magnum on the round block webely....apparently Holland felt they were strong enough for this round and it has modern pressures to be sure.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 398 Likes: 19
Sidelock
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 398 Likes: 19 |
Sent the photos to SKB - Thanks Yup, the design has been around a long time, at least 1902, the date of the Webley patent. Mine (if I can, and it does) will be 22 RF.. well, maybe...17RF?
Dumb, but learning...Prof Em, BSc(ME), CAE (FYI)
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 7,088 Likes: 462
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 7,088 Likes: 462 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,857 Likes: 384
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,857 Likes: 384 |
the webely is just as strong as any falling block just easyer to make the breech block.do you have larger photos. mc
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 398 Likes: 19
Sidelock
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 398 Likes: 19 |
Will soon have some more progress to show, will try to post them myself and larger. Take a deep breath..... Oh, anyone notice the unusual/odd thing I am doing on this? (besides the project itself) Hint-very Alex Henry.
Dumb, but learning...Prof Em, BSc(ME), CAE (FYI)
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 16
Boxlock
|
Boxlock
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 16 |
Great project! - I've been interested in these little actions since Ross Seyfried wrote about one in .455 Webley [in DGJ]; I think he shot a cow elk with it! There's no engineering reason they should be any weaker than a square breech, and good modern steel and heat treatment is available now as well. I can't see much in the pics, but is your Alex Henry "oddity" an external lock? Left or right-hand?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 398 Likes: 19
Sidelock
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 398 Likes: 19 |
Well, not sure that I can agree that they are as strong - The round back has a spreading action as well as the push, so... Many (a lot) Alex Henry rifles were external lock, as one will be, and yup, left hand lock, also a Henry trait.
Dumb, but learning...Prof Em, BSc(ME), CAE (FYI)
|
|
|
|
|