|
|
|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
|
29
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forums10
Topics38,934
Posts550,852
Members14,460
| |
Most Online1,344
Apr 29th, 2024
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 11,464 Likes: 133
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 11,464 Likes: 133 |
Confusion here on the Z-R's. They're not the current Rizzinis. These are the guns imported by Abercrombie & Fitch back in the 60's and 70's. The Rizzini involved, as I recall, was Guido. Same family, but not the same company as either B. or I. (FAIR) Rizzini. The Z-R guns were not alloy.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,373 Likes: 6
Sidelock
|
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,373 Likes: 6 |
Tracking the inter-relationships of Italian makers is even more confusing than trying to understand Italian wines.
That is an impressive weight for a steel receiver gun. I wonder how well they hold up to consistent use, even if with 3/4 oz loads.
Such a long, long time to be gone, and a short time to be there.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 11,464 Likes: 133
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 11,464 Likes: 133 |
Following Greener's "rule of 96" (the gun should weigh at least 96 times the weight of the shot charge fired through it), a 28 gauge firing the standard 3/4 oz load could weigh as little as 4 1/2 pounds.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 13,880 Likes: 16
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 13,880 Likes: 16 |
LB,
I'd hate to have a 28g that light. My repro with std skeet AA loads is sharp enough kicking at 5 1/2 lbs. And I'm pretty sure I couldn't shoot well with a gun that light.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 11,464 Likes: 133
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 11,464 Likes: 133 |
"Too light" is why I passed on it, Chuck.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
