S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
1 members (Researcher),
508
guests, and
4
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums10
Topics39,500
Posts562,122
Members14,587
|
Most Online9,918 Jul 28th, 2025
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,954 Likes: 12
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,954 Likes: 12 |
By 1900, there were relatively robust systems in place. The 1890's saw a real burst of creativity and understanding. The Boss single trigger seems to have set the pace. I am under the impression that there are shooters for whom double triggers really are a detrement. Considering the social pressure that surrounded the upper end of shooting, some were willing to pay serious money to solve the single trigger issue. Boss got that job done. Others followed.
Personally, I rarely remember moving my finger from trigger to trigger - it just happens on auto-pilot. On the other hand, I don't suppose that because it works so for me means that it should be so for everyone.
|
|
|
Entire Thread
|
inertia triggers--good, bad, and why??
|
David Furman
|
01/19/07 07:44 PM
|
Re: inertia triggers--good, bad, and why??
|
rabbit
|
01/19/07 09:13 PM
|
Re: inertia triggers--good, bad, and why??
|
jack maloney
|
01/19/07 09:17 PM
|
Re: inertia triggers--good, bad, and why??
|
Researcher
|
01/19/07 09:30 PM
|
Re: inertia triggers--good, bad, and why??
|
tanky
|
01/19/07 10:45 PM
|
Re: inertia triggers--good, bad, and why??
|
improved modified
|
01/19/07 10:53 PM
|
Re: inertia triggers--good, bad, and why??
|
builder
|
01/19/07 11:15 PM
|
Re: inertia triggers--good, bad, and why??
|
King Brown
|
01/19/07 11:24 PM
|
Re: inertia triggers--good, bad, and why??
|
ShootingStar
|
01/20/07 01:14 PM
|
Re: inertia triggers--good, bad, and why??
|
Shoot-N-Release
|
01/20/07 03:33 AM
|
Re: inertia triggers--good, bad, and why??
|
Utah Shotgunner
|
01/20/07 07:55 AM
|
Re: inertia triggers--good, bad, and why??
|
David Williamson
|
01/20/07 01:51 PM
|
Re: inertia triggers--good, bad, and why??
|
eightbore
|
01/20/07 01:59 PM
|
Re: inertia triggers--good, bad, and why??
|
jack maloney
|
01/20/07 02:14 PM
|
Re: inertia triggers--good, bad, and why??
|
L. Brown
|
01/21/07 12:54 AM
|
Re: inertia triggers--good, bad, and why??
|
sxsman1
|
01/21/07 01:05 AM
|
Re: inertia triggers--good, bad, and why??
|
Rocketman
|
01/22/07 03:26 PM
|
Re: inertia triggers--good, bad, and why??
|
jack maloney
|
01/22/07 07:59 PM
|
Re: inertia triggers--good, bad, and why??
|
David Furman
|
01/22/07 08:04 PM
|
Re: inertia triggers--good, bad, and why??
|
Rocketman
|
01/22/07 08:41 PM
|
Re: inertia triggers--good, bad, and why??
|
David Furman
|
01/22/07 08:53 PM
|
Re: inertia triggers--good, bad, and why??
|
Rocketman
|
01/22/07 09:25 PM
|
Re: inertia triggers--good, bad, and why??
|
William E Apperson
|
01/22/07 09:27 PM
|
Re: inertia triggers--good, bad, and why??
|
L. Brown
|
01/22/07 10:03 PM
|
Re: inertia triggers--good, bad, and why??
|
jack maloney
|
01/22/07 11:05 PM
|
Re: inertia triggers--good, bad, and why??
|
L. Brown
|
01/23/07 12:59 PM
|
Re: inertia triggers--good, bad, and why??
|
Rocketman
|
01/23/07 01:47 PM
|
Re: inertia triggers--good, bad, and why??
|
jack maloney
|
01/23/07 02:20 PM
|
Re: inertia triggers--good, bad, and why??
|
Ted Schefelbein
|
01/23/07 02:23 PM
|
Re: inertia triggers--good, bad, and why??
|
jack maloney
|
01/23/07 03:15 PM
|
Re: inertia triggers--good, bad, and why??
|
L. Brown
|
01/23/07 05:10 PM
|
Re: inertia triggers--good, bad, and why??
|
jack maloney
|
01/23/07 05:49 PM
|
Re: inertia triggers--good, bad, and why??
|
L. Brown
|
01/24/07 01:10 AM
|
Re: inertia triggers--good, bad, and why??
|
jack maloney
|
01/24/07 02:39 AM
|
Re: inertia triggers--good, bad, and why??
|
Ted Schefelbein
|
01/24/07 02:16 PM
|
Re: inertia triggers--good, bad, and why??
|
jack maloney
|
01/24/07 02:52 PM
|
Re: inertia triggers--good, bad, and why??
|
jcj
|
01/24/07 03:31 PM
|
Re: inertia triggers--good, bad, and why??
|
L. Brown
|
01/24/07 08:53 PM
|
|
|
|