The problem here is that the fellow obviously does not know anything about what is legal and what is not. He is running a gun business without an FFL, but doesn't realize that he can ship guns without the use of an FFL. I wonder if he pays this "my FFL" guy every time he uses him to ship a gun? Maybe he used "my FFL" guy to comply with the requirements of his stock business. IN A LATER POST, I GET THE IDEA THAT THE POSTER IS THE STOCK GUY, NOT THE "OTHER GUY" I SEEM TO HAVE BEEN MISTAKEN. SORRY.

Last edited by eightbore; 03/23/11 03:17 PM.