|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forums10
Topics39,662
Posts563,867
Members14,605
| |
Most Online9,918 Jul 28th, 2025
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,355 Likes: 428
Sidelock
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,355 Likes: 428 |
Hi all, I have a nice SxS that is currently choked .000/.005 and I wanted to get some more choke out of her. Jug choking seemed to be the answer, but I was concerned about the wall thickness. It was suggested I give Heritage Gunsmiths a call. I did and they said that they could "sleeve" choke into the bbls. The cost is $250 per bbl.
Can anyone comment on this process as I've never heard of this before?
Thanks so much!!
Greg
Gregory J. Westberg MSG, USA Ret
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,857 Likes: 385
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,857 Likes: 385 |
the muzzle is bored to accept a short sleeve that is soldered in, then reamed to the choke you want.i don't know if thin wall choke tubes might be a better idea unless you don't like choke tubes.i think Brownells sells the sleeve so you could look them up to get an idea of what they are. mc
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,478 Likes: 54
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,478 Likes: 54 |
Mike Orlen does/did choke sleeving, and there was a how-to article a few years ago in one of the online magazines.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,954 Likes: 14
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,954 Likes: 14 |
It is a perfectly good process, if done well. It is much like chamber sleeving, but on the other end of the barrel.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,355 Likes: 428
Sidelock
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,355 Likes: 428 |
Thanks all, just added something new to the old noodle - learn something new everyday!
Thanks again!
Greg
Gregory J. Westberg MSG, USA Ret
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,373 Likes: 6
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,373 Likes: 6 |
so if I understand this correctly, choke sleeving is an alternative to jug choking if you are looking to increase constriction (Cyl to IC for instance) and don't want to install removable chokes. If that is the case, is there any reason to choose choke sleeving over jug choking (sounds like the latter might be easier and less expensive)?
Such a long, long time to be gone, and a short time to be there.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,544
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,544 |
Maybe you did so already but try different loads at the ranges you intend to kill at and see if you really need more choke. My experience suggests few need as much as they think and that missing down range has more to do with being off line than pattern failure.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,373 Likes: 6
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,373 Likes: 6 |
Thanks Dig. That was more of a hypothetical question - I am just curious about what the options might be, as I wonder if some of the vintage guns with really open chokes suffer in the market because of the perception (valid or otherwise) that they are too open-choked to be useful. I assume jug-choking results in reduced BWT near the muzzle (in the section of the bore that is opened up ahead of the "jug", in which case BWT could become a concern in an older gun that already seen some polishing. I would think choke sleeving would be an alternative in that case.
Such a long, long time to be gone, and a short time to be there.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 496
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 496 |
gjw: The article you refer to is in the Nov - Dec 2005 issue of Double Gun Classics, A copy is available from Cornell Publications.
And, Dig is right. I hit 99% of what I lead properly with Cyl or Full.
Best, Kensal
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,815 Likes: 4
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,815 Likes: 4 |
I had my M 21 choke sleeved in one barrel. It was cyl and i wanted about a .010. I had Briley do it and it has worked well.
|
|
|
|
|