|
|
|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forums10
Topics39,659
Posts563,809
Members14,605
| |
Most Online9,918
Jul 28th, 2025
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 114 Likes: 1
Sidelock
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 114 Likes: 1 |
I am looking to buy a early M32-1st year prod- and was wondering if someone could tell me what the standard chamber length and bore diameter was for these guns when they left the factory? Just want to make sure that the barrels have not been messed with.
Thanks,
Tom
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 14,493 Likes: 291
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 14,493 Likes: 291 |
Remington drawings of the time for Parker shotguns show chambers 1/8 inch shorter than the shells they were meant to accommodate. The shells of the day being 2 3/4, the chambers will probably be 2 5/8 inches. I don't know what the Model 32 advertising claimed for standard chamber length. However, old #273 (in my lap at this time)seems to have full 2 3/4 inch chambers so I wouldn't be alarmed if your was anywhere between 2 5/8 and 2 3/4. #273 seems to be all original in every other respect.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,983
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,983 |
My guess is they came with 2-3/4" chambers. 2-3/4" chambers were becoming standard about the time the M32 came out, I think. I wasn't here yet, so again, it's just a guess.
> Jim Legg <
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 14,493 Likes: 291
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 14,493 Likes: 291 |
Oh, bore diameter. Old #273 runs a quite tight .726 to .727. I assume some were made a bit closer to the nominal .729, but not my old gun. I hope you get a nice one, and would choose to post the serial number. I also have 1878 which may not be a first year gun.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
