NCA you fail to address or even acknowledge the argument that is being made: There is enough uncertainty in the science that economics and world politics are important considerations in what actions need to be taken or postponed here in the USA.
If the cost to swtich is zero let's ban fossil fuels now. The science is certain enough to justify that.
If the cost is ten times the US annual gross domestic product then the science is not certain enough now and we need to wait before we take drastic action.
Of course neither figure is realistic so the scrimmage line is somewhere in between.
The economics are very important in these discussions.
And no, I don't think a warm March in Iowa or a particular area the South East having a tornada season that is well out on the bell curve prove any weather trends.
Best,
Mike
