NCA you fail to address or even acknowledge the argument that is being made: There is enough uncertainty in the science that economics and world politics are important considerations in what actions need to be taken or postponed here in the USA.
If the cost to swtich is zero let's ban fossil fuels now. The science is certain enough to justify that.
If the cost is ten times the US annual gross domestic product then the science is not certain enough now and we need to wait before we take drastic action....
He already admitted in this thread that he won't put his money where his mouth is. That to me is plenty proof enough that someone is full of s..t, not simply have different political leanings. Sorry to jump on your note Mike.
