|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
Forums10
Topics39,491
Posts562,028
Members14,585
|
Most Online9,918 Jul 28th, 2025
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 26
Boxlock
|
OP
Boxlock
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 26 |
Can anyone tell me the pressure to which London Best guns are proofed in the London Proof House? Thanks for any and all replies.
Douglass A. Craig
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 11,571 Likes: 165
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 11,571 Likes: 165 |
There's no difference, to my knowledge, between the two British proofhouses. Information I have from the Birmingham Proofhouse states that standard proof guns (formerly marked 850 bars, now STD under a crown) were proofed to a pressure equivalent to 13,920 psi. The former magnum proof was 1200 bars (now marked SUP under 2 crowns) and equates to a pressure of something over 19,000 psi.
|
|
|
|
Black and Tan
Unregistered
|
Black and Tan
Unregistered
|
I have seen a recent London proofed Bill Blacker barrel with no indication of pressure tested. That is no "850 bars" stamp. What is their current mark or procedure for designating standard proof?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 26
Boxlock
|
OP
Boxlock
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 26 |
Douglass A. Craig
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 1,543 Likes: 102
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 1,543 Likes: 102 |
Under CIP rules 12 bore 2&1/2 and 2&3/4 950 bar max service pressure 740 bar 16 bore 980 bar ....................................780 bar 20/28 bore 1040 bar..................................830 bar All 3 inch 1320 bar
No pressures are marked but barrels are stamped "standard" or "superior" [STD SUP ] There is no direct conversion to other systems of measurement due to the current way of testing . This information was obtained from the Birmingham Proof House last month through one of the Guardians who obtained it for me . It is difficult to keep up with the current marks as little seems to have been published ,The CIP web site dose have some information if you are of a technical mind to interpret , but dose not appear to have the tables of proof pressures that people want and the Proof houses do not at present have any available booklets or information sheets .I am asking my Guardian friend that this matter be raised at a Guardians meeting with a view to having some form of tables issued .
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 11,571 Likes: 165
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 11,571 Likes: 165 |
Black and Tan (and others), you need to know that the proof pressure hasn't actually changed since the previous proofmark system, when 12 bore guns were marked 850 bars. Those measurements were based on the old lead crusher system. Gunman's figures (950 bar for the 12) doesn't represent a change, but rather a conversion from lead crusher measurement to electronic transducer. If you're familiar with older reloading guides, think lead units of pressure (LUP) vs psi.
One of these days, we're all going to start speaking the same language when it comes to proof and service pressure . . . but I'm not sure I'll live to see it happen!
|
|
|
|
Black and Tan
Unregistered
|
Black and Tan
Unregistered
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,544
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,544 |
Barrels are tested twice - one shot with pressure peaking 1" from the chamber and the second at 9".
Proof pressures used are intended to be +25% of intended pressure of actual maximum loads used (and loaded for commercially)
Last edited by Small Bore; 06/23/12 09:27 AM.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 866
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 866 |
Since we are back on proof pressures again perhaps I will re-ask an earlier question,two questions actually. Is black powder re-proof still available, and if so, what are the proof and service pressures that are used? Thanks
Better to keep your mouth shut and be thought stupid,than open it and confirm.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,815 Likes: 4
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,815 Likes: 4 |
Ben was right, we are seperated by a common language
|
|
|
|
|
|