Just about everything I know about NWL '38 and GCA '68 I learned from following this debate.

Considering only undisputed factual statements about the actual content of the two acts, it's clear to me that the latter is nothing like a near word-for-word copy of the former. Citing general similarity in selected provisions is not evidence of a even a single verbatim sentence. SHOUTING and vulgarity doesn't advance an argument, and is certainly no substitute for documentation to support a claim that if true could be proven by objective evidence.