S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
4 members (smlekid, SKB, PALUNC, 1 invisible),
373
guests, and
5
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums10
Topics39,515
Posts562,234
Members14,590
|
Most Online9,918 Jul 28th, 2025
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 709
Sidelock
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 709 |
an English shotgun, most likely made between the wars, with no mention of chamber length on the barrels or flats? Thanks
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,338 Likes: 344
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,338 Likes: 344 |
Hi Pooch, what is the bore and shot weight on the bbl flats? Also a pic of two of the bbl flats should help.
Be Good!
Greg
Gregory J. Westberg MSG, USA Ret
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,954 Likes: 12
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,954 Likes: 12 |
Most likely 2 1/2". However, do not translate 2 3/4" chamber into OK for use with SAAMI ammo (that is mostly what you can buy in USA without special effort like mail order). Even if it turns out to be a 2 3/4" chamber it will need care and feeding with CIP standard ammo and/or reloads of known pressure (SAy, sub 8000 psi).
DDA
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,226 Likes: 3
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,226 Likes: 3 |
2" is also possible although they are usually identified by a special model name as well as on bbls/water table.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 9,409 Likes: 4
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 9,409 Likes: 4 |
an English shotgun, most likely made between the wars, with no mention of chamber length on the barrels or flats? Thanks The English proof was based on tons per square inch and not the chamber length in the barrels. One could find gun with 65mm chambers proofed for heavy 1&1/4oz load, etc....
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,338 Likes: 344
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,338 Likes: 344 |
an English shotgun, most likely made between the wars, with no mention of chamber length on the barrels or flats? Thanks The English proof was based on tons per square inch and not the chamber length in the barrels. One could find gun with 65mm chambers proofed for heavy 1&1/4oz load, etc.... Very true, but Tons psi (Birmingham proof) or "Tons" (London proof) markings are under the Rules of 1954. If the gun is between the wars, then the chamber "should" be marked "2 1/2", 2 3/4" etc" and not in metric mm's. Shot size should give you a feel for what the chamber length "might" be. If the gun were a 2" it would be marked on the rib also. Best bet would be to just shoot 2 1/2" low pressure loads in her to be safe. Best of luck! Greg
Gregory J. Westberg MSG, USA Ret
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 247
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 247 |
Best bet is to get off the cheap and buy a chamber gauge. It always amazes me, how so many men will step up on their dime [time] and try to answer questions like this. CB
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,338 Likes: 344
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,338 Likes: 344 |
Pooch may just want to know what the original chambering was and just wants to see if the chambers have been let out.
But I agree for the current chambering, a gauge is the only way to go.
All the best!
Greg
Gregory J. Westberg MSG, USA Ret
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 12,743
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 12,743 |
A 6" flexible machinist's scale is quite adequate for measuring the length of a chamber, even one of the inexpensive ones from your home improvement store will do fine. It is in some few cases even more accurate than a chamber gauge. Simply hold the bbls up toward a light, I normally use a window, & look in. move the bbls around till you have the cone thrown in a shadow. Slide the scale in where you can view it & watch for it to come flush with the shadow line. Do it a few times to ensure you are being consistent. With only a few tries you will find you can easily read the depth to within the 1/64" markings of the scale, plenty close enough for measuring chamber depth.
Should the chamber be a bit undersize, not uncommon on older guns, & be only .001" smaller at the end than the diameter of the gage, the gauge will show it about .200" short, which it isn't. The case where the scale is actually more accurate. An old saying from my youth, "There's always more than one way to Skin a Cat", there are simply not many "Only Ways" to do anything.
Miller/TN I Didn't Say Everything I Said, Yogi Berra
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 11,573 Likes: 165
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 11,573 Likes: 165 |
Very true, but Tons psi (Birmingham proof) or "Tons" (London proof) markings are under the Rules of 1954. If the gun is between the wars, then the chamber "should" be marked "2 1/2", 2 3/4" etc" and not in metric mm's.
Greg
Not quite, Greg. 2 1/2 or 2 3/4 would not have been marked under the proof rules of 1904, which remained in force until 1925. On guns proofed in 1925 or later, you will find chamber length. That's a quick and easy way to distinguish a gun with pre-1925 proof from one with post-1925 proof. Otherwise, those two sets of proofmarks are pretty similar. Rocketman's caution about 2 3/4" shells is also spot on. And another thing to be wary of would be guns which have been lengthened to 2 3/4" in the States but not submitted for reproof. You'll find quite a few of those floating around on the market in this country. Too many, in fact.
|
|
|
|
|