Originally Posted By: keith

Doug, thanks for giving details on how the Democrats are really the ones responsible for the crash of 2008. Notice how Gnomoron and his liberal minions avoid even acknowledging any of that. The game plan is to just let the facts slip into the past and go back to blaming Bush. They have no shame.

Hopefully, folks here will help spread the word and counter the Big Lie. Now instead of letting Obama spike the ball for the no-brainer decision to take out Osama bin Ladin, maybe we should also remind folks that it was Bill Clinton who refused to take bin Ladin out in 1998. That little faux pas cost us thousands of lives, tens of thousands of injured soldiers, and trillions of dollars.

Bush's fault?


"No Man has a good enough memory to be a successful lier" -----Abraham Lincoln

www.forbes.com/2009/10/03/community-rein...-schweizer.html

The White House and Congress want to expand a 30-year old law--the Community Reinvestment Act--that helped fuel the mortgage meltdown..., What CRA does in effect, is compel banks to seek the permission of community activists to get regulatory approval for bank expansions and mergers. Often this means striking a deal with activist groups such as ACORN or Unions like the Service Employees International Union (SEIU) and agreeing to allocate credit to poor and minority areas that are under served.

In short, the CRA encourages banks to make loans they would not ordinarily make. What's more, these agreements often require that banks "offer No Money Down" mortgages and remove caps on how much debt a borrower can take on. All of this is done in the name of "FINANCIAL DEMOCRACY".

http://spectator.org/archives/2009/02/06/the-true-origins-of-this-finan

There really isn't any question of which approach is factually correct: right on the front page of the Times edition of December 21 is a chart that shows growth of home ownership in the United States since 1990. In 1993 it was 63 percent; by the end of the Clinton administration is was 68 percent. The growth in the Bush administration was about 1 percent. The Times itself reported in 1999 that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were under pressure from the Clinton administration to INCREASE lending to minorities and low-income buyers --a policy that necessarily entailed higher risk. Can there really be a question, other than in the fevered imagination of the Times, WHERE THE PUSH TO REDUCE STANDARDS AND INCREASE HOME OWNERSHIP CAME FROM...???

Therefore CLINTON'S REPEAL OF THE "GLASS-STEAGALL ACT OF 1933" on November 12, 1999.

**Clinton also allowed queers TO STAY in the military FOR THE FIRST TIME with his "don't ask don't tell" B.S., prior to Clinton and this failed Dem social adjusting attempt, queers were given Medical Discharges and turned out ASAP.....

**As Keith mentioned, Clinton allowed Bin Laden to leave the TERRRORIST TRAINING CAMP without "pulling the trigger"...(the cruise missle was targeted and HOT before the STAND DOWN ORDER CAME)...the excuse was the presence of a terrorist camp visiting Saudi Prince.....really......normal lib procedure....therefore sentencing thousands of U.S. soldiers and civilians to death in years that followed.....great move......

But, it was all Bush's fault.......

The rest is history and the lib morons will never admit another of their failed attempts to manipulate society...always for the worse and under the guise of we want to help "da po folk"...!

For those who really want to know and possibly learn something: "The Magic Negro"..the monikers origin and it's meaning/history;----

http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/commentary/la-oe-ehrenstein19mar19,0,3391015.story




Doug