Originally Posted By: King Brown
I'd feel better about 2nd protection if our side stopped shooting itself in the foot with the makes-no-difference between 10 and larger magazines, cross-messaging of the worst kind. The antis are saying if the difference is 6-8 seconds what's the problem of excluding the 10-plus?


We've told you and the other lullers how acquiescing to a reduced magazine ban makes a difference on many occasions. How long do you think it will be before some nut-bar shoots a bunch of innocents in a school or theatre using multiple handguns and multiple 10 round magazines? The Obama administration has been extremely lax in prosecuting prohibited persons who have attempted to buy guns through legal sources. They are clearly after law abiding gun owners and I believe they don't prosecute these illegal attempted buyers because they really want killings to occur so they can advance their agenda. How else would you explain it? He keeps telling us that we need his new restrictions if it will only save a few lives. So why this glaring sin of omission King?

The predictable incrementalist gun banner response will be to call for restrictions on handguns and further reductions in magazine capacity. Then when that doesn't work, they will go after pump shotguns or anything with a magazine. Then when that doesn't work, the hue and cry will be to ban all repeaters, including our doubles. The end game for Obama and his kind is the total elimination of the Second Amendment and private ownership of firearms. He has said so with his own mouth, so fake photo-op pictures of him shooting a shotgun are nothing more than a Democrat I.Q. test to me. Anyone who believes that is stupid, pure and simple.

How many times does the scenario have to be played out around the world before you understand that if we give an inch, they will take 37 miles?

The origins of this thread remind me of the scene at a gun show I attended a couple weeks ago. Multiple lines formed around the buildings long before the doors opened. A sea of humanity crowded in to stock up on guns and magazines and ammunition. And I thought, if only half of these fools had looked at the facts and voted for anyone but Obama, we wouldn't be in a mad rush to stock up on commodities (at highly inflated prices) that we have a civil right to posess. I agree we need to stick together at times like this, but when will we learn that times like this keep arising because so many gun owners are so damn gullible?


Voting for anti-gun Democrats is dumber than giving treats to a dog that shits on a Persian Rug