I've become intrigued with Husqvarna model 20 under lever guns. I've never shot or handled one, but I'd like to find a reliable 16 ga. "shooter." I'm not too conncerned about how it looks, but I don't want to spend a lot of money in case I can't get used to the under lever action. I recently passed on a newer Model 20 in good condition priced at at $420.
There is a Husqvarna Model 20 made in 1910 with blued steel barrels and 2-1/2" chambers and described as being in good mechanical condition with tight lock-up. However, it has what is described as "light" pitting throughout the right bore (although I'm not sure I would know the difference between light and moderate pitting).
Another Model 20 made in 1907 with steel barrels is available for a slightly lower price. It is described as mechanically fine with tight lock-up and excellent bore. Barrels have turned a light patina and the frame a grey color. Stock has a crack on the left side between the lock plate and upper tang.
Both are 16 ga. and the asking prices are $150 and $145 respectively.
So, "lightly" pitted bore vs. cracked stock--anyone willing to express an opinion as to which might be the better deal/lower risk?
I'd shoot either gun using 2-1/2" low pressure shells. Is it practical to consider polishing out the pits, assuming there is sufficient barrel thickness? How dificult would it be to repair the cracked stock?
