|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 members (gerryk_5, SKB, Jim H., 3 invisible),
208
guests, and
4
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Forums10
Topics38,630
Posts547,170
Members14,431
| |
Most Online1,344
Apr 29th, 2024
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 839
Sidelock
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 839 |
Here's a compromise:
We put ed good in a $2500 suit with a $10,000 Rolex on his wrist, then drop him off in downtown Detroit.
Next, we simply wait until them law-abiding brothers show him the way home...
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 1,202
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 1,202 |
Here's a compromise:
We put ed good in a $2500 suit with a $10,000 Rolex on his wrist, then drop him off in downtown Detroit.
Next, we simply wait until them law-abiding brothers show him the way home... A Timex and Nike shoes will be enough in that town....
The liberals are asking us to give Obama time.
We agree, and think 25 to life would be Appropriate.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 9,761 Likes: 99
Sidelock
|
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 9,761 Likes: 99 |
maybe some one else who reads this thread is grounded in reality. you guys certainly do not seem to be grounded in any thing except racial prejudice, rigid ideology and hot air...we have a system of government that is built on the concept of compromise, with checks and balances. and, it works when we the voters want it too.
why not trade universal background checks for certain classes of semi auto firearms in exchange for roll back of the draconian, knee jerk, anti gun legislation of the late sixties and early nineties?...too bad they were not temporary acts, such as the infamous and now defunct assault rifle ban.
Last edited by ed good; 05/14/13 11:00 AM.
keep it simple and keep it safe...
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 1,202
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 1,202 |
You can buy several houses for the price of a cheap Timex in Detroit.
I'm not kidding. Meaning people won't even move there for free....THats why the Muslims are happy there.....they enjoy hell holes even the Black thugs run from.
Last edited by boneheaddoctor; 05/14/13 11:04 AM.
The liberals are asking us to give Obama time.
We agree, and think 25 to life would be Appropriate.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 6,500 Likes: 397
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 6,500 Likes: 397 |
maybe some one else who reads this thread is grounded in reality. you guys certainly do not seem to be grounded in any thing except racial prejudice, rigid ideology and hot air...we have a system of government that is built on the concept of compromise, with checks and balances. and, it works when we the voters want it too.
why not trade universal background checks for certain classes of semi auto firearms in exchange for roll back of the draconian, knee jerk, anti gun legislation of the late sixties and early nineties?...too bad they were not temporary acts, such as the infamous and now defunct assault rifle ban. Ed, I'm not a racist. I don't care that Obama is black or that he may be Muslim or that he was probably not born in the US. I care that he lies, is constantly deceptive and has a rigid leftist ideology. He is not a supporter of the democratic traditions of the US. You do have a system of government that involves checks and balances and I believe the current POTUS is actively subverting those checks and balances. One of the key checks is the 2cd amendment. And Obama, together with like minded individuals, are in a long term game to remove that right from the average citizen. The evidence that is their plan is overwhelming. They didn't start it, but they have bought into it and are doing their best to execute it. It is social engineering, whether you like it or not. The fundamental issue isn't even guns. It's freedom of choice. The gun is, as it always is, simply a tool.
Last edited by canvasback; 05/14/13 11:15 AM. Reason: grammar
The world cries out for such: he is needed & needed badly- the man who can carry a message to Garcia
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 7,438
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 7,438 |
Compromise? You may as well make a pact with the devil.
Every day the news get worse:
First there's the Benghazi cover up
Then the revelation that the IRS targeted Tea Party members and other conservatives
Now we are finding out that the Justice Dept. is tapping reporters phone lines
When will it end? When will there be enough outrage in this Country to take some action?
Jim
The 2nd Amendment IS an unalienable right.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 1,202
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 1,202 |
And I have absolutely no reason to believe this has not been going on since the day he took office....its just coming out now.
Hillary pulled this same stunt with Filegate.....and got away with it.
She had enough on him to get appointed Secretary of State....and he had enough on her to keep her more or less in line....
Two thieves in a pod.
Last edited by boneheaddoctor; 05/14/13 11:33 AM.
The liberals are asking us to give Obama time.
We agree, and think 25 to life would be Appropriate.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 839
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 839 |
And what if nothing ever happens?
Except that they come for you, your wife and kids. Because they know where the guns are.
Thanks to ed's "compromise" background check...
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 7,474 Likes: 221
Sidelock
|
|
Sidelock
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 7,474 Likes: 221 |
maybe some one else who reads this thread is grounded in reality. you guys certainly do not seem to be grounded in any thing except racial prejudice, rigid ideology and hot air...we have a system of government that is built on the concept of compromise, with checks and balances. and, it works when we the voters want it too.
why not trade universal background checks for certain classes of semi auto firearms in exchange for roll back of the draconian, knee jerk, anti gun legislation of the late sixties and early nineties?...too bad they were not temporary acts, such as the infamous and now defunct assault rifle ban. 'Grounded in reality'?, maybe you didn't notice Doug's comment about your truths and the legality of criminal gun use. Maybe you intended to intentionally mislead. Instead of ownership word gymnastics, why not contend that nearly all guns are legally manufactured and if we ban the making, then it's easier to give up any class of firearms and we get the bonus of taking background checks off the discussion table. Over the last few months, there seems(!) to be a slight turn around in the momentum for new gun control legislation. You have specifically ignored the case against universal background checks, but....you want to intentionally put it back on the table for no reason other than 'compromise'. Prejudice, rigid ideology and hot air...you sound like a lib bashing the 'gun lobby'. You might send the NRA a thank you note, make it a c-note, for helping you out beyond the capability of your single vote.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 9,761 Likes: 99
Sidelock
|
|
OP
Sidelock
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 9,761 Likes: 99 |
guys: you still don't get it...
what I am suggesting is universal back ground checks on certain semi auto firearms in exchange for repeal of the gun control acts of 1968 and 1993. if the pro gun politicians could accomplish that via compromise with the anti gun politicians, then that would be a good thing?
keep it simple and keep it safe...
|
|
|
|
|
