October
S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31
Who's Online Now
1 members (Hammergun), 440 guests, and 2 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums10
Topics39,503
Posts562,169
Members14,587
Most Online9,918
Jul 28th, 2025
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 931
Sidelock
***
OP Offline
Sidelock
***

Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 931
Drew House - sorry, I didn't follow your link, thinking it would lead to another ad for an old American double. Thank you!

Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,971
Likes: 103
Sidelock
**
Offline
Sidelock
**

Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,971
Likes: 103
Pressure is pressure. It does not matter what the source of it is--BP or nitro. Both attain their peak pressures in the chamber and quickly diminish in the bore. I have been surprised at how similar the pressure curves are between the two. My personal conclusion is a nitro load generating pressure equal to BP is gentler on the gun than BP.

I think there are good reasons American guns were built heavier in the breech than English or European. Americans tended to reload their ammunition and in general there was little understanding of the forces nitro was capable of creating. Some of the earliest nitros were designed to be bulk measured exactly like BP. Technology moved very quickly and soon nitro products had to be weighed and here a problem arose. Many continued to bulk measure it--often with disastrous consequences. Nonetheless, American makers tended to build heavier breech areas to withstand ungodly pressures. In contrast English and European shooters seldom reloaded and ammunition was generally standardized with acceptable and defined pressures. Therefore, gunmakers could safely build guns with lighter breeches. (Much of this is paraphrased from writings of W.W. Greener)

With today's reloading information and components it is very easy to assemble loads with pressures no higher than BP and produce velocities in excess of 1200 fps.


John McCain is my war hero.
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,609
Likes: 14
Sidelock
**
Offline
Sidelock
**

Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,609
Likes: 14
Joe Wood makes perfect sense in his first paragraph.

Black powder is an explosive and it's peak pressure is immediate whereas nitro powder is designed to burn progressively. Although they may feel the same at the moment of ignition they are quite different in the chamber.

Last edited by DAM16SXS; 09/24/13 09:20 AM.
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 12,743
Sidelock
***
Offline
Sidelock
***

Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 12,743
It is also worth noting I think that the early smokeless powders were not really progressive burning. When these powders were loaded to give ballistics similar to the familiar BP loads they produced higher peak chamber pressures than did black. When loaded to similar pressures to Black these "Fast" smokeless powders will give
lesser ballistics than black. When the slower more progressive powders are loaded down to BP pressures many of them will prove unreliable, particularly as the temps fall as in many hunting situations. For the most part they were not truly designed to produce low pressure, but to allow heavier payloads, higher velocities or Both. Except for the mess BP is near about a perfect shotgun propellant.


Miller/TN
I Didn't Say Everything I Said, Yogi Berra
Page 2 of 2 1 2

Link Copied to Clipboard

doublegunshop.com home | Welcome | Sponsors & Advertisers | DoubleGun Rack | Doublegun Book Rack

Order or request info | Other Useful Information

Updated every minute of everyday!


Copyright (c) 1993 - 2024 doublegunshop.com. All rights reserved. doublegunshop.com - Bloomfield, NY 14469. USA These materials are provided by doublegunshop.com as a service to its customers and may be used for informational purposes only. doublegunshop.com assumes no responsibility for errors or omissions in these materials. THESE MATERIALS ARE PROVIDED "AS IS" WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EITHER EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANT-ABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, OR NON-INFRINGEMENT. doublegunshop.com further does not warrant the accuracy or completeness of the information, text, graphics, links or other items contained within these materials. doublegunshop.com shall not be liable for any special, indirect, incidental, or consequential damages, including without limitation, lost revenues or lost profits, which may result from the use of these materials. doublegunshop.com may make changes to these materials, or to the products described therein, at any time without notice. doublegunshop.com makes no commitment to update the information contained herein. This is a public un-moderated forum participate at your own risk.

Note: The posting of Copyrighted material on this forum is prohibited without prior written consent of the Copyright holder. For specifics on Copyright Law and restrictions refer to: http://www.copyright.gov/laws/ - doublegunshop.com will not monitor nor will they be held liable for copyright violations presented on the BBS which is an open and un-moderated public forum.

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.0.33-0+deb9u11+hw1 Page Time: 0.086s Queries: 22 (0.064s) Memory: 0.8110 MB (Peak: 1.9016 MB) Data Comp: Off Server Time: 2025-10-12 21:23:36 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS