October
S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 1,244 guests, and 3 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums10
Topics39,524
Posts562,424
Members14,592
Most Online9,918
Jul 28th, 2025
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 5 of 5 1 2 3 4 5
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 465
Likes: 13
Sidelock
Offline
Sidelock

Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 465
Likes: 13
Originally Posted By: L. Brown

It'd be nice if they'd all settle on one standard method of measuring and expressing velocity, as we have on this side of the pond. But I think they like to confuse us.


I think one reason there is no standard in the UK/Europe is that there is nothing like as much interest in velocity (in my experience anyway).

From my recollection, the manufacturers quoting velocities on the box is quite recent, and I don't think many buyers look anyway.

Generally here, buyers choose the cartridge size (usually 2 1/2 or 2 3/4 for 12 bore) shot size and shot load (often 28 or 30 grammes). Many have a preferred brand. As far as I know ALL cartridges sold are CIP approved, and of course virtually all UK guns are in current proof, so there is little thought of pressure or velocity.

Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 12,743
Sidelock
***
Offline
Sidelock
***

Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 12,743
Not sure how long ago it was, but formerly velocities in the US were quoted over 40 yards. The beginnings of these velocities over a longer range have their roots in when measurements were taken with a "Boulenge Chronograph". These instruments simply were not capable of measuring small enough time intervals to give accurate readings with close screen spacings near the muzzle. These often had the start wire attached to the muzzle itself, but the stop screen some distance down range. For shotshell velocities the 20-40 yard range was about the near & far limits of their range. Modern Chronographs capable of reading very short time intervals changed all this. The former though did prove to be quite accurate when used within its capabilities.


Miller/TN
I Didn't Say Everything I Said, Yogi Berra
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 11,573
Likes: 166
Sidelock
**
Offline
Sidelock
**

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 11,573
Likes: 166
The Zutz article to which I referred earlier has him quoting Ed Lowry of Winchester as having learned that previous downrange velocity readings were inaccurate. Might be because of the older equipment you mention, Miller.

Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,544
Sidelock
***
OP Offline
Sidelock
***

Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,544
John and I concur. This has clearly caused a stir of interest and interesting information.

One thing i have observed from meetings with US owners of British guns, especially those who load their own shells, is a bit of over reversal of the old 'magnumitis' that is well known. It is that many feel that British vintage guns need to be loaded with very light, slow and ultra low-pressure shells.

Seeing what is commonly used in the UK in our classic guns might be a useful indicator of what they are made to withstand. any 2 1/2" shell sold in the UK will be safe to use in a gun proofed for 2 1/2" shells.

Some are more civilised than others, but a very wide range of suitable ammunition is available for this 'standard' British game gun chambering.

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 11,573
Likes: 166
Sidelock
**
Offline
Sidelock
**

Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 11,573
Likes: 166
The problem for us, Dig, is that we don't know the pressures of your British loads--other than that they're within CIP specs. If they're well below the CIP maximum for a standard proof gun, that might mean pretty low pressure. If they're close to the CIP maximum, then they're not all that much different (about 800 psi) than our own SAAMI maximum of 11,500 psi.

I've never gone nearly as low as a lot of reloaders. I figure I'm safe in the 7-8,000 psi range, even figuring in some additional pressure for a longer hull used in a shorter chamber. And I've shot field loads of 7300 psi, 1 1/8 oz shot, 1200 fps--although not a lot of them--at pheasants. Seem to work fine (and produce very nice patterns) in vintage British doubles. But I've also never played around with anything older than 1920, except a couple sleeved guns from the 1880's.

Page 5 of 5 1 2 3 4 5

Link Copied to Clipboard

doublegunshop.com home | Welcome | Sponsors & Advertisers | DoubleGun Rack | Doublegun Book Rack

Order or request info | Other Useful Information

Updated every minute of everyday!


Copyright (c) 1993 - 2024 doublegunshop.com. All rights reserved. doublegunshop.com - Bloomfield, NY 14469. USA These materials are provided by doublegunshop.com as a service to its customers and may be used for informational purposes only. doublegunshop.com assumes no responsibility for errors or omissions in these materials. THESE MATERIALS ARE PROVIDED "AS IS" WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EITHER EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANT-ABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, OR NON-INFRINGEMENT. doublegunshop.com further does not warrant the accuracy or completeness of the information, text, graphics, links or other items contained within these materials. doublegunshop.com shall not be liable for any special, indirect, incidental, or consequential damages, including without limitation, lost revenues or lost profits, which may result from the use of these materials. doublegunshop.com may make changes to these materials, or to the products described therein, at any time without notice. doublegunshop.com makes no commitment to update the information contained herein. This is a public un-moderated forum participate at your own risk.

Note: The posting of Copyrighted material on this forum is prohibited without prior written consent of the Copyright holder. For specifics on Copyright Law and restrictions refer to: http://www.copyright.gov/laws/ - doublegunshop.com will not monitor nor will they be held liable for copyright violations presented on the BBS which is an open and un-moderated public forum.

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.0.33-0+deb9u11+hw1 Page Time: 0.135s Queries: 25 (0.104s) Memory: 0.8167 MB (Peak: 1.9020 MB) Data Comp: Off Server Time: 2025-10-22 08:27:48 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS